Misplaced Pages

Big Spring, Texas: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:12, 27 February 2006 editLeslie Mateus (talk | contribs)4,621 edits External links: +pt← Previous edit Revision as of 05:23, 27 February 2006 edit undo200.117.216.9 (talk) added infoNext edit →
Line 53: Line 53:


== Culture and Economics == == Culture and Economics ==

CWA Announces 2005 Prince of Pomposity Winner 12/12/2005
By Jan LaRue, Esq.

PC Mag writer is miffed at CWA for blocking “his” .xxx porn domain.

Here we were nearing the end of 2005 and Concerned Women for America (CWA) didn’t have a winner for our annual “Prince of Pomposity” (PP) award. But as happens in this magical season, our Prince appeared in the nick of time.

’Twas days before Christmas and all through my house,
Not a creature was stirring ’cept my computer mouse;
When from my computer there arose such aclatter,
I sprang to see what was the matter.
Away to Windows I flew like a flash,
Clicked open the shutters and threw up the sash.
And what to my wondering eyes should appear,
Our PP winner bedecked with a sneer!

By way of background, our PP winner, John Dvorak, writes for PC Magazine. He read our December 1 press release heralding the news that Vint Cerf, chairman of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), announced November 30 that the .xxx domain proposal had been removed from the agenda for ICANN’s upcoming meeting.

A not-too-cheery Dvorak promptly called CWA to say that he wanted to talk to me “to find out where in the world you guys got the idea that the .xxx domain would be a bad thing.” Our press secretary called Dvorak back at my request and asked him to read my column that explains our opposition and then to call me. Dvorak grinchly declined, saying he had all he needed.

It seems Dvorak is all scrooged-up because, like Al Gore, a previous PP winner who “invented” the Internet, Dvorak was expecting ubiquitous acclaim once ICANN approved his “creation.” So rather than having a civil discussion with me after reading my column, Dvorak spilled some yellow ink on us in his column “Ubiquitous Porn: Alive on the Net,” which was also posted on the Web sites of Fox News and ABC News.

As a result, CWA has received calls and e-mails from some who share Dvorak’s opinion that we are “naïve do-gooders” and “knuckleheads,” and suspect that “pornographers themselves are behind” our opposition.

And wouldn’t you know? Most of the callers and e-mailers say they are evangelical, techno-wizard, God-fearing, porn-hating, dads and granddads who agree with CWA on most issues but will never again support us because we’re ignorant, bigoted and stupid. And they expect we will find them sincere because Dvorak told them we’re women who can be “tricked.”

So it is our great pleasure to bestow CWA’s 2005 Prince of Pomposity Award on John Dvorak. Just as Al Gore’s Internet links us all to the World Wide Web, oh, what merry fun it is to link these cyber-spaced PPs.

Dvorak spent sufficient time on our Web site in order to beef up his feeble argument with our “cookie-cutter Jerry Falwell theology” and our “red, white, and blue” articles on birth control, gay marriage, evolution, stem-cell research, etc. Can you spell r-e-l-e-v-a-n-c-e?

After acknowledging that he’s “certain that most online pornographers would all rather have a .com extension,” Dvorak blames us that “porn publishers are getting their wish to stay in the mainstream.” We’re trying to figure out how he will get pornographers into his voluntary .xxx domain and also get them out of the “mainstream.” Maybe another one of Santa’s cheery elves will e-mail an explanation. Maybe they’ll also explain how Dvorak will make pornographers, who get to self-regulate their .xxx domain, keep kids out, when they refuse to do so now.

I forgot. Dvorak says his creation won’t be a “magnet for kids” because “most normal kids do not want to see porn.” They must be virtual kids. So much for the legal doctrine known as “attractive nuisance” and the cold, hard fact that most kids have seen cyber porn, want it or not.

So how would an exclusive .xxx domain “make it brain-dead easy to keep porn out of the American family home”?

Dvorak equates it to “zoning” and “isolation,” and assumes that because CWA opposes his “creation,” we “would demand” that “adult bookstores next to churches.”

Now why didn’t we think of this sure-fire fundraiser for our church-oriented constituency? We’re just naïve women who need to be led by brilliant men.

Apparently while scouring our Web site, Dvorak missed or chose not to inform his readers that I spent several years assisting city officials across the country in drafting zoning and licensing regulations for sexually oriented businesses (SOBs). In all my years of consulting with city officials, I’ve never heard anyone suggest that the “real” solution to protecting kids and families from the adverse secondary effects of SOBs would be to create an exclusive, voluntary, SOB-regulated porn zone and let the SOBs continue to operate in all existing locations.

There’s the cyber-world and then there’s the real world. In the real world, real cities with real enforcement power require brick and mortar SOBs to locate in real zones with real distances, as in measurable feet, from sensitive uses such as churches, schools and residential zones. They enforce laws with real consequences that really reduce the adverse effects.

In keeping with the spirit of Christmas, we’re giving Dvorak credit for understanding that there isn’t a measurable distance between one cyber-domain and another, and that every cyber-domain “locates” on every Internet-accessible computer within mouse clicks of another. We’re talking about members of an industry that flagrantly violate federal obscenity laws that contain real punishments in order to make billion-dollar profits. Surely he understands that they will not voluntarily abandon all their current sites and operate from one domain. Surely Dvorak knows there’s no virtual world overhead equivalent to the real world that would motivate them to do so.

Dvorak says the .xxx domain will make it easier for software filters to aid parents in keeping porn out of their homes and away from their children. There are effective software filters, but no company claims it has a foolproof version that creates an impenetrable wall between kids and porn. Furthermore, millions of kids have access to Internet computers without filters. And many figure out how to disable them.

Worse yet, creating an .xxx porn domain would make it harder, not easier, for filter companies, because it will double their work. There’s a good reason there’s an ANN, Assigned Names and Numbers, in ICANN.

Porn Web sites have at least one assigned .com name, such as www.filth.com, and some have several, such as www.filth.net, www.filth.org, www.filth.info, www.filth.biz, etc. Dvorak would add www.filth.xxx. Remembering a name makes it easier to find sites on the WWW. Otherwise, everybody would have to know and remember a site’s Assigned Number (numeric IP address), which is what computers that run the Internet use to find Web sites. Currently, filters block Web sites by name.

Dvorak and other proponents of an .xxx domain argue that all software filters will have to do, assuming all smut-peddlers exclusively relocate in the .xxx domain, is to block that domain. Here’s one big lump of coal in that stocking. There are many Web sites that provide the numeric IP address when a user enters a .com name. All that’s necessary to get to a Web site that’s blocked by a filter is to put its numeric IP address into the Web browser and hit “go.”

If one computer-savvy kid knows that, how long do you think it will take the information to pass through cyberspace to other kids? When it does, filter companies will have to identify the numeric IP address for every porn site and block that as well as the .com name. At last count by the former N2H2 software filter company, and its successor, Secure Computing, there are 2.1 million porn Web sites, which at a rate of 200 pages per site, translates to 420 million porn pages in their data base. You do the cyber-math.

As I said in my column: “Allowing an industry that produces and distributes hard-core pornography prosecutable under the federal obscenity laws to voluntarily self-regulate makes as much sense as allowing Murder Incorporated to regulate hitmen who voluntarily register with www.wackjobsrus.mob.”

Rather than shaming Vint Cerf, as Dvorak has, all of us who think the .xxx porn domain should “dash away! dash away! dash away all!”, should write Cerf a thank you letter and tell him to “delete” the .xxx domain delusion permanently. His address is:

Vint Cerf, Chairman
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, California 90292-6601.

Send a copy to:

Secretary Carlos Gutierrez
U.S. Dept. of Commerce
1401 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20230.

And to John Dvorak, Merry Christmas! May you laugh like a bowlful of jelly.

Jan LaRue is Chief Counsel for Concerned Women for America. This article first appeared on Human Events Online.
Big Spring’s ] is primarily based on ] (with ] as the primary crop) and ] production and ]. Public-sector institutions such as Howard College, a ], and a ] are also major employers in the area. Big Spring’s ] is primarily based on ] (with ] as the primary crop) and ] production and ]. Public-sector institutions such as Howard College, a ], and a ] are also major employers in the area.



Revision as of 05:23, 27 February 2006

Located in Texas at the crossroads of U.S. Highway 87 and Interstate 20, Big Spring’s population of 25,233 (2000 Census) makes it the largest city between Midland to the west, Abilene to the east, Lubbock to the north, and San Angelo to the south. Big Spring was established as the county seat of Howard County in 1882 and is also the largest city in that county. It was named for the spring in nearby Sulphur Draw. The spring was the center of a territorial dispute between Comanche and Shawnee peoples and a popular watering hole for wildlife in the mostly arid area.

Geography

Location of Big Spring, Texas
Location of Big Spring, Texas

Big Spring is located at 32°14'36" North, 101°28'31" West (32.243198, -101.475231)Template:GR.

According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 49.7 km² (19.2 mi²). 49.5 km² (19.1 mi²) of it is land and 0.2 km² (0.1 mi²) of it is water. The total area is 0.42% water.

Demographics

As of the censusTemplate:GR of 2000, there are 25,233 people, 8,155 households, and 5,463 families residing in the city. The population density is 509.8/km² (1,320.4/mi²). There are 9,865 housing units at an average density of 199.3/km² (516.2/mi²). The racial makeup of the city is 76.69% White, 5.31% African American, 0.59% Native American, 0.63% Asian, 0.02% Pacific Islander, 14.41% from other races, and 2.35% from two or more races. 44.64% of the population are Hispanic or Latino of any race.

There are 8,155 households out of which 32.8% have children under the age of 18 living with them, 48.3% are married couples living together, 14.1% have a female householder with no husband present, and 33.0% are non-families. 29.2% of all households are made up of individuals and 14.6% have someone living alone who is 65 years of age or older. The average household size is 2.51 and the average family size is 3.10.

In the city the population is spread out with 23.6% under the age of 18, 9.9% from 18 to 24, 32.7% from 25 to 44, 19.7% from 45 to 64, and 14.1% who are 65 years of age or older. The median age is 35 years. For every 100 females there are 125.2 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there are 132.3 males.

The median income for a household in the city is $28,257, and the median income for a family is $35,448. Males have a median income of $27,636 versus $21,863 for females. The per capita income for the city is $14,119. 22.2% of the population and 17.1% of families are below the poverty line. Out of the total population, 30.0% of those under the age of 18 and 18.3% of those 65 and older are living below the poverty line.

Points of Interest

Landmarks

Organizations

Media

Education

Prisons

  • Big Spring FCI
  • Big Spring Federal Prison Camp
  • Big Spring Correctional Center (Cornell Companies)

Culture and Economics

CWA Announces 2005 Prince of Pomposity Winner 12/12/2005 By Jan LaRue, Esq.

PC Mag writer is miffed at CWA for blocking “his” .xxx porn domain.

Here we were nearing the end of 2005 and Concerned Women for America (CWA) didn’t have a winner for our annual “Prince of Pomposity” (PP) award. But as happens in this magical season, our Prince appeared in the nick of time.

’Twas days before Christmas and all through my house, Not a creature was stirring ’cept my computer mouse; When from my computer there arose such aclatter, I sprang to see what was the matter. Away to Windows I flew like a flash, Clicked open the shutters and threw up the sash. And what to my wondering eyes should appear, Our PP winner bedecked with a sneer!

By way of background, our PP winner, John Dvorak, writes for PC Magazine. He read our December 1 press release heralding the news that Vint Cerf, chairman of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), announced November 30 that the .xxx domain proposal had been removed from the agenda for ICANN’s upcoming meeting.

A not-too-cheery Dvorak promptly called CWA to say that he wanted to talk to me “to find out where in the world you guys got the idea that the .xxx domain would be a bad thing.” Our press secretary called Dvorak back at my request and asked him to read my column that explains our opposition and then to call me. Dvorak grinchly declined, saying he had all he needed.

It seems Dvorak is all scrooged-up because, like Al Gore, a previous PP winner who “invented” the Internet, Dvorak was expecting ubiquitous acclaim once ICANN approved his “creation.” So rather than having a civil discussion with me after reading my column, Dvorak spilled some yellow ink on us in his column “Ubiquitous Porn: Alive on the Net,” which was also posted on the Web sites of Fox News and ABC News.

As a result, CWA has received calls and e-mails from some who share Dvorak’s opinion that we are “naïve do-gooders” and “knuckleheads,” and suspect that “pornographers themselves are behind” our opposition.

And wouldn’t you know? Most of the callers and e-mailers say they are evangelical, techno-wizard, God-fearing, porn-hating, dads and granddads who agree with CWA on most issues but will never again support us because we’re ignorant, bigoted and stupid. And they expect we will find them sincere because Dvorak told them we’re women who can be “tricked.”

So it is our great pleasure to bestow CWA’s 2005 Prince of Pomposity Award on John Dvorak. Just as Al Gore’s Internet links us all to the World Wide Web, oh, what merry fun it is to link these cyber-spaced PPs.

Dvorak spent sufficient time on our Web site in order to beef up his feeble argument with our “cookie-cutter Jerry Falwell theology” and our “red, white, and blue” articles on birth control, gay marriage, evolution, stem-cell research, etc. Can you spell r-e-l-e-v-a-n-c-e?

After acknowledging that he’s “certain that most online pornographers would all rather have a .com extension,” Dvorak blames us that “porn publishers are getting their wish to stay in the mainstream.” We’re trying to figure out how he will get pornographers into his voluntary .xxx domain and also get them out of the “mainstream.” Maybe another one of Santa’s cheery elves will e-mail an explanation. Maybe they’ll also explain how Dvorak will make pornographers, who get to self-regulate their .xxx domain, keep kids out, when they refuse to do so now.

I forgot. Dvorak says his creation won’t be a “magnet for kids” because “most normal kids do not want to see porn.” They must be virtual kids. So much for the legal doctrine known as “attractive nuisance” and the cold, hard fact that most kids have seen cyber porn, want it or not.

So how would an exclusive .xxx domain “make it brain-dead easy to keep porn out of the American family home”?

Dvorak equates it to “zoning” and “isolation,” and assumes that because CWA opposes his “creation,” we “would demand” that “adult bookstores next to churches.”

Now why didn’t we think of this sure-fire fundraiser for our church-oriented constituency? We’re just naïve women who need to be led by brilliant men.

Apparently while scouring our Web site, Dvorak missed or chose not to inform his readers that I spent several years assisting city officials across the country in drafting zoning and licensing regulations for sexually oriented businesses (SOBs). In all my years of consulting with city officials, I’ve never heard anyone suggest that the “real” solution to protecting kids and families from the adverse secondary effects of SOBs would be to create an exclusive, voluntary, SOB-regulated porn zone and let the SOBs continue to operate in all existing locations.

There’s the cyber-world and then there’s the real world. In the real world, real cities with real enforcement power require brick and mortar SOBs to locate in real zones with real distances, as in measurable feet, from sensitive uses such as churches, schools and residential zones. They enforce laws with real consequences that really reduce the adverse effects.

In keeping with the spirit of Christmas, we’re giving Dvorak credit for understanding that there isn’t a measurable distance between one cyber-domain and another, and that every cyber-domain “locates” on every Internet-accessible computer within mouse clicks of another. We’re talking about members of an industry that flagrantly violate federal obscenity laws that contain real punishments in order to make billion-dollar profits. Surely he understands that they will not voluntarily abandon all their current sites and operate from one domain. Surely Dvorak knows there’s no virtual world overhead equivalent to the real world that would motivate them to do so.

Dvorak says the .xxx domain will make it easier for software filters to aid parents in keeping porn out of their homes and away from their children. There are effective software filters, but no company claims it has a foolproof version that creates an impenetrable wall between kids and porn. Furthermore, millions of kids have access to Internet computers without filters. And many figure out how to disable them.

Worse yet, creating an .xxx porn domain would make it harder, not easier, for filter companies, because it will double their work. There’s a good reason there’s an ANN, Assigned Names and Numbers, in ICANN.

Porn Web sites have at least one assigned .com name, such as www.filth.com, and some have several, such as www.filth.net, www.filth.org, www.filth.info, www.filth.biz, etc. Dvorak would add www.filth.xxx. Remembering a name makes it easier to find sites on the WWW. Otherwise, everybody would have to know and remember a site’s Assigned Number (numeric IP address), which is what computers that run the Internet use to find Web sites. Currently, filters block Web sites by name.

Dvorak and other proponents of an .xxx domain argue that all software filters will have to do, assuming all smut-peddlers exclusively relocate in the .xxx domain, is to block that domain. Here’s one big lump of coal in that stocking. There are many Web sites that provide the numeric IP address when a user enters a .com name. All that’s necessary to get to a Web site that’s blocked by a filter is to put its numeric IP address into the Web browser and hit “go.”

If one computer-savvy kid knows that, how long do you think it will take the information to pass through cyberspace to other kids? When it does, filter companies will have to identify the numeric IP address for every porn site and block that as well as the .com name. At last count by the former N2H2 software filter company, and its successor, Secure Computing, there are 2.1 million porn Web sites, which at a rate of 200 pages per site, translates to 420 million porn pages in their data base. You do the cyber-math.

As I said in my column: “Allowing an industry that produces and distributes hard-core pornography prosecutable under the federal obscenity laws to voluntarily self-regulate makes as much sense as allowing Murder Incorporated to regulate hitmen who voluntarily register with www.wackjobsrus.mob.”

Rather than shaming Vint Cerf, as Dvorak has, all of us who think the .xxx porn domain should “dash away! dash away! dash away all!”, should write Cerf a thank you letter and tell him to “delete” the .xxx domain delusion permanently. His address is:

Vint Cerf, Chairman ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, California 90292-6601.

Send a copy to:

Secretary Carlos Gutierrez U.S. Dept. of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20230.

And to John Dvorak, Merry Christmas! May you laugh like a bowlful of jelly.

Jan LaRue is Chief Counsel for Concerned Women for America. This article first appeared on Human Events Online. Big Spring’s economy is primarily based on agriculture (with cotton as the primary crop) and petroleum production and refining. Public-sector institutions such as Howard College, a federal prison, and a VA hospital are also major employers in the area.

Big Spring’s population and economy have seen steady declines since the closure of Webb Air Force Base, a training site for Air Force bombardiers and pilots, in 1977.

In recent years Big Spring has been the site of several major hang gliding championship tournaments, including the U.S. Hang Gliding Nationals. Big Spring will host the Hang Gliding World Championship in 2007.

The opening scenes of the film Midnight Cowboy, the 1969 Academy Award winner for Best Picture, were filmed in Big Spring. The city was also the site for the filming of parts of Hangar 18.

Green Bay Packers tight end Bubba Franks, although born in California, was raised and played high school football in Big Spring.

History

The completion of the Texas and Pacific Railroad led to the the founding in the early 1880s of Abilene, Colorado City, and Big Spring, three railroading and ranching towns where saloons, gambling dens, and prostitutes flourished. These establishments attracted cowboys and later oilfield workers from throughout the region. Prostitution continuted to flourish in Big Spring well into the 1950s. The Settles Hotel was well known as a center for prostitution in Big Spring, with the large sign on the roof being used to signal the presence of prostitutes in the hotel.

In 1957 anti-prostitution groups gained an influential advocate in Texas attorney general Will Wilson, whose office led the way in disrupting Texas prostitution, including the Galveston racketeers. Church, legal and news media pressure forced many brothels to close and set the prostitution business on a downward course that continued into the 1960s. Wilson's was influential in pressing local law-enforcement officials into curbing prostitution in Big Spring.

References

  1. Daniel "Bubba" Franks bio (2000 NFL draft preview) on packers.com, the official website of the Green Bay Packers

External links

Template:Mapit-US-cityscale

State of Texas
Austin (capital)
Topics
Society
Regions
Metropolitan
areas
CountiesSee: List of counties in Texas
flag Texas portal
Categories: