| Revision as of 16:35, 22 February 2011 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits @Jsw← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 22 February 2011 edit undoAsdfg12345 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers6,640 edits →Falun Gong articlesNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Sorry, that last post was by me and I forgot to sign off on my post with ] (]) 16:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC) | Sorry, that last post was by me and I forgot to sign off on my post with ] (]) 16:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *Indeed, Dilip rajeev made my life a misery with his disruption; but he has been very reserved since the case. Olaf Stephanos seems to have disappeared; asdfg continues to wikilawyer, armed with his 'high quality sources', with a veneer of respectability and apparence of willing to engage in discussion. Editing those articles became a negotiation on their terms – a game I was no longer prepared to play. that asdfg and PCPP are both headed for a lengthy topic ban or site ban. Good riddance to bad rubbish. --] ] 16:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC) | *Indeed, Dilip rajeev made my life a misery with his disruption; but he has been very reserved since the case. Olaf Stephanos seems to have disappeared; asdfg continues to wikilawyer, armed with his 'high quality sources', with a veneer of respectability and apparence of willing to engage in discussion. Editing those articles became a negotiation on their terms – a game I was no longer prepared to play. that asdfg and PCPP are both headed for a lengthy topic ban or site ban. Good riddance to bad rubbish. --] ] 16:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :That's a bit harsh. I thought I was good rubbish. --<font style="bold">]</font><font color="black" style="bold">]</font> 17:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:08, 22 February 2011
.svg)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
_(cropped).jpg)
 | This user is a native of Hong Kong. |
 | This user is a citizen of the United Kingdom. |
 | This user lives in France. |
 | This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 18 years, 11 months and 26 days. |
| Another styletip ...
According to Robertson, "when Haversham claims 'the theory is universal', he is disregarding two critical limitations".
Add this to your user page by typing in {{Styletips}} |
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ohconfucius/archive18. |
 |
|
Exchanges specific to my Engvar script are also archived at |
Falun Gong articles
Hi, I haven't logged in for a very long time and noticed you filed a case against Dilip rajeev back in 2009, and that you've stopped editing FLG-related articles as of 2010. It seems as if despite our vastly different political opinions we may both agree on the fact that: 1) Dilip rajeev has been far more disruptive "editing" FLG-related pages than Samuel Luo ever was; 2) There is a massive bias on FLG pages where they (users like Asdfg) will seek to drive out anybody who doesn't agree to a heavily skewed article where they spend most of their time criticising the Chinese government and complaining about their persecution than on their FLG belief system - assuming they weren't a movement founded only for being anti-CPC; 3) that Misplaced Pages has done nothing to remedy it and has changed any huge argument by banning one side's users without banning the other, thus failing to adhere to its fairness and NPOV (among other policies) policies.
If you've noticed, the discussion pages there have only grown longer because it has been totally flooded by contributions by FLG practitioners, mainly on one account Asdfg12345, where their points are heavily spaced out, obviously hoping that by blanketing the recent discussion pages with a FLG propaganda leaflet-style article, innocent new users may actually believe the "neutrality" of the article simply because nobody is contesting it. It's a great pity, really.
Sorry, that last post was by me and I forgot to sign off on my post with Jsw663 (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, Dilip rajeev made my life a misery with his disruption; but he has been very reserved since the case. Olaf Stephanos seems to have disappeared; asdfg continues to wikilawyer, armed with his 'high quality sources', with a veneer of respectability and apparence of willing to engage in discussion. Editing those articles became a negotiation on their terms – a game I was no longer prepared to play. It now seems that asdfg and PCPP are both headed for a lengthy topic ban or site ban. Good riddance to bad rubbish. --Ohconfucius 16:35, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's a bit harsh. I thought I was good rubbish. --Asdfg12345 17:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)