| Revision as of 01:23, 25 February 2011 editNeutralhomer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers75,192 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:40, 25 February 2011 edit undoN419BH (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,799 edits *sad face*Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ::::RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to ]; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the ]. Come back Jack! ] | ] 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC). | ::::RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to ]; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the ]. Come back Jack! ] | ] 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC). | ||
| :::::Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">] • ] • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)</small> | :::::Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">] • ] • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
| ::::::Sorry to see you go Jack. <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">]]</span> 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:40, 25 February 2011
What happened? Why the sudden blanking?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I assume this has something to do with it. Wish I had known about it, I would have made a statement. SnottyWong 19:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go Jack. N419BH 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)