| Revision as of 16:25, 28 February 2006 editMaxamegalon2000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,885 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:28, 28 February 2006 edit undoKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →[]: speedy keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Non-notable; just another baseless litigant in this lawsuit-crazed culture | Non-notable; just another baseless litigant in this lawsuit-crazed culture | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep'''. He has appeared multiple times on multiple news networks, and his various legal cases always make headlines. When his Pledge of Allegiance case was ruled in his favor by the Court of Appeals, the U.S. Congress and President Bush immediately responded. Whether or not his claims are baseless is for the courts to decide; if he were the generic lawsuit-crazed person this nomination implies, he wouldn't be on his way to argue before the Supreme Court for the second time. --] 16:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Keep'''. He has appeared multiple times on multiple news networks, and his various legal cases always make headlines. When his Pledge of Allegiance case was ruled in his favor by the Court of Appeals, the U.S. Congress and President Bush immediately responded. Whether or not his claims are baseless is for the courts to decide; if he were the generic lawsuit-crazed person this nomination implies, he wouldn't be on his way to argue before the Supreme Court for the second time. --] 16:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep''', nom is Gastrich noming notable atheists again. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:28, 28 February 2006
Michael_Newdow
Non-notable; just another baseless litigant in this lawsuit-crazed culture
- Speedy Keep. He has appeared multiple times on multiple news networks, and his various legal cases always make headlines. When his Pledge of Allegiance case was ruled in his favor by the Court of Appeals, the U.S. Congress and President Bush immediately responded. Whether or not his claims are baseless is for the courts to decide; if he were the generic lawsuit-crazed person this nomination implies, he wouldn't be on his way to argue before the Supreme Court for the second time. --Maxamegalon2000 16:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, nom is Gastrich noming notable atheists again. KillerChihuahua 16:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)