| Revision as of 16:32, 28 February 2006 editJcbarr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,258 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:37, 28 February 2006 edit undoWeregerbil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,447 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep''', nom is Gastrich noming notable atheists again. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Speedy Keep''', nom is Gastrich noming notable atheists again. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. I didn't recognize the name, but certainly the case was notable and thus warrants an article. -] 16:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. I didn't recognize the name, but certainly the case was notable and thus warrants an article. -] 16:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' per ]. Bad faith AfD nomination. ] 16:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 28 February 2006
Michael_Newdow
Non-notable; just another baseless litigant in this lawsuit-crazed culture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy Lee Wallace (talk • contribs) 16:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. He has appeared multiple times on multiple news networks, and his various legal cases always make headlines. When his Pledge of Allegiance case was ruled in his favor by the Court of Appeals, the U.S. Congress and President Bush immediately responded. Whether or not his claims are baseless is for the courts to decide; if he were the generic lawsuit-crazed person this nomination implies, he wouldn't be on his way to argue before the Supreme Court for the second time. --Maxamegalon2000 16:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, nom is Gastrich noming notable atheists again. KillerChihuahua 16:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I didn't recognize the name, but certainly the case was notable and thus warrants an article. -Jcbarr 16:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per KillerChihuahua. Bad faith AfD nomination. Weregerbil 16:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)