Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/History of Maryland Route 200: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:19, 15 March 2011 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits History of Maryland Route 200← Previous edit Revision as of 02:01, 15 March 2011 edit undoGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,048 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under MarylandNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Merge''' We don't need a separate history article for a state highway article. No other highway article in the U.S. has this. --''']]]''' 01:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC) *'''Merge''' We don't need a separate history article for a state highway article. No other highway article in the U.S. has this. --''']]]''' 01:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
*Also see ]. --''']]]''' 01:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC) *Also see ]. --''']]]''' 01:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 02:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 02:01, 15 March 2011

History of Maryland Route 200

History of Maryland Route 200 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not need separate article on history of route. Like the opposition article, the information can be condensed and covered in a section of the Maryland Route 200 article. Dough4872 23:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Keep - Although the 2 articles could be merged having a separate article relating to the history of the Road is ok as long as there is sufficient information and sources to do so and there seems to be plenty here. --Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories: