| Revision as of 19:54, 22 March 2011 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,206 edits →Your AE comment: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:06, 22 March 2011 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,738 edits →Your AE commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| Hi, thanks for the input at AE, but I believe you are mistaken when you say that "After Marek made a single edit—an edit that was different from the one Jacurek had been making—he stopped editing the article. Jacurek started warring to keep Marek's change in the article." This does not seem to be the case, as this chronological sequence of edit shows: , , . In addition, there are many older reverts in the history, e.g. , which are also part of the edit war Volunteer Marek continued. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | Hi, thanks for the input at AE, but I believe you are mistaken when you say that "After Marek made a single edit—an edit that was different from the one Jacurek had been making—he stopped editing the article. Jacurek started warring to keep Marek's change in the article." This does not seem to be the case, as this chronological sequence of edit shows: , , . In addition, there are many older reverts in the history, e.g. , which are also part of the edit war Volunteer Marek continued. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Malik, do you consider yourself involved in this case? Because if not, being an admin, you could make your comments in the "uninvolved admins" section. Since you never took part in any revert wars of such kind, IMHO, you are uninvolved. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 22:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:06, 22 March 2011
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 | Are you here because I deleted your article? Please read this before you leave me a message. |
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Need admin help
Hi Malik Shabazz, i got this message from some anonymous user on my talk page, who is very much frustrated by Misplaced Pages. It'd be better if admin like you will answer him.Bill william compton 04:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- In the news: Ward Cunningham's rich child; Indian donations; data mining Misplaced Pages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Your AE comment
Hi, thanks for the input at AE, but I believe you are mistaken when you say that "After Marek made a single edit—an edit that was different from the one Jacurek had been making—he stopped editing the article. Jacurek started warring to keep Marek's change in the article." This does not seem to be the case, as this chronological sequence of edit shows: Jacurek, Jacurek, Volunteer Marek. In addition, there are many older reverts in the history, e.g. , which are also part of the edit war Volunteer Marek continued. Sandstein 19:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Malik, do you consider yourself involved in this case? Because if not, being an admin, you could make your comments in the "uninvolved admins" section. Since you never took part in any revert wars of such kind, IMHO, you are uninvolved. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)