| Revision as of 04:25, 28 March 2011 editShearonink (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,323 edits →Your series of edits: Comment - incorrect marking of an edit as minor← Previous edit |
Revision as of 08:39, 28 March 2011 edit undoBulldog123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,423 edits answered on talk pageNext edit → |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. ] (]) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. ] (]) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Thanks. I must have accidentally missed tagging it. ] 08:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Thanks. I must have accidentally missed tagging it. ] 08:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Your series of edits (March 2011)== |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey there Bulldog123, I came across your series of edits removing ]/] from the See Also section for multiple articles. I'm not sure I understand your rationale for doing so, I see the 'what' from your edit summaries but would appreciate a little more of the 'why'. Thanks, ] (]) 01:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
*I've noticed this as well. It's especially disturbing as it follows Bulldog's effort to delete a related list of Black people, and mirrors in some respects a series of his deletions which focused on Jews. A number of editors -- both sysops and non-sysops -- have made similar observations in the past. I view this series of edits as highly disruptive, and urge Bulldog123 to self-revert.--] (]) 02:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] Have come across a similar type of edit, where you removed the ] link from the ] article with . A more-complete edit summary would be helpful in this instance as well. Additionally you marked this edit as '''minor'''. To quote from ] "A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions...A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Your use of the minor edit box with this edit seems incorrect, please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly ''are'' minor edits. Thank you, ] (]) 04:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
|
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. VegaDark (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
