| Revision as of 19:10, 30 March 2011 edit99.190.85.150 (talk) →Thank you for your thoughtful comments on Talk:Sustainability regarding File:Nested sustainability-v2.gif ... see Talk:Individual and political action on climate change: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:33, 30 March 2011 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 editsm Reverted edits by 99.190.85.150 (talk) to last version by GranitethighsNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for eventual comments about the article. Well done! ] (]) 23:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for eventual comments about the article. Well done! ] (]) 23:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks Jez ... and for tidying up around the edges ... and for stepping in for the former assessor.] 23:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | :Thanks Jez ... and for tidying up around the edges ... and for stepping in for the former assessor.] 23:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Thank you for your thoughtful comments on ] regarding File:Nested sustainability-v2.gif ... see ] == | |||
| Thank you for your thoughtful comments on ] regarding File:Nested sustainability-v2.gif (], ], and ] relationship ]) in ], and indirectly in ] (see ]). ] (]) 19:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:33, 30 March 2011
|
| 1 2 |
History of botany
The Talk:History of botany/GA1 page hasn't been created by anyone, so as you can see it's not under review, hence why I removed that; had I not it would have sat there indefinitely with no one picking it up. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 12:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of History of botany
The article History of botany you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:History of botany for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For History of botany. I don't know why, but I just felt that the article was very compelling. If only all the "history of science" articles were of this grade... Cheers, ResMar 02:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
Hey you... please wake up
Hey... where have you gone Granitethighs? I hope you haven't let that most abysmal "administrator" get to you. You have done some superb work here, way beyond anything he could ever achieve. This stuff is kind of definitive. Don't let one miserable arsehole get in your way. --Epipelagic (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
GA nominations
Hi Granitethights - I just wanted to let you know that procedures have changed at GAN over the last few months, and now everything on the GAN page is done by bot. To nominate an article, you simply place the GAN template at the top of the talk page, and the page is automatically entered onto the GAN page for you. The bot is removing your entries from the GAN page because there is no template on the talk page. All of the instructions for the new process are found in the instructional boxes at the top of the GAN page, if you wish to know more or need a refresher on the GAN template syntax. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Anselme Riedlé
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anselme Riedlé, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.freebooknotes.com/Peter_Good.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding this article - you are correct that it isn't a copyright violation, but when copying any creative material from one wikipedia article to another (such as the "Other gardener-botanists..." section), you do need to attribute the source of the content as described in Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. I've added attribution for this article. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 13:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Félix Delahaye
The article Félix Delahaye you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Félix Delahaye for eventual comments about the article. Well done! AGK 00:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cultivar
The article Cultivar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cultivar for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Jez ... and for tidying up around the edges ... and for stepping in for the former assessor.Granitethighs 23:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)