| Revision as of 18:25, 28 February 2006 editRichardF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users44,505 editsm →External links: cat sort← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:29, 4 March 2006 edit undoEdwy (talk | contribs)9,176 edits recat per CFD of 24 February 2006 using AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ==Standards for educational evaluation== | ==Standards for educational evaluation== | ||
| The ] published three sets of standards for educational evaluations. ''The Personnel Evaluation Standards'' {{ref|Personnel}} was published in 1988, ''The Program Evaluation Standards'' (2nd edition) {{ref|Program}} was published in 1994, and ''The Student Evaluations Standards'' {{ref|Students}} was published in 2003. | The ] published three sets of standards for educational evaluations. ''The Personnel Evaluation Standards'' {{ref|Personnel}} was published in 1988, ''The Program Evaluation Standards'' (2nd edition) {{ref|Program}} was published in 1994, and ''The Student Evaluations Standards'' {{ref|Students}} was published in 2003. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
| ===The Personnel Evaluation Standards=== | ===The Personnel Evaluation Standards=== | ||
| * The propriety standards require that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved in. | * The propriety standards require that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved in. | ||
| * The utility standards are intended to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential. | * The utility standards are intended to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
| ===The Program Evaluation Standards=== | ===The Program Evaluation Standards=== | ||
| * The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. | * The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users. | ||
| * The feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. | * The feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
| ===The Student Evaluation Standards=== | ===The Student Evaluation Standards=== | ||
| * The Propriety standards help ensure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation. | * The Propriety standards help ensure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation. | ||
| * The Utility standards promote the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations. | * The Utility standards promote the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 25: | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| Line 39: | Line 34: | ||
| ==Notes and references== | ==Notes and references== | ||
| # {{note|Personnel}} Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). '''' Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. | # {{note|Personnel}} Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). '''' Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. | ||
| # {{note|Program}} Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). '''' Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. | # {{note|Program}} Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). '''' Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 52: | ||
| * web site. | * web site. | ||
| * | * | ||
| ⚫ | {{edu-stub}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] |
] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | {{edu-stub}} | ||
Revision as of 12:29, 4 March 2006
Educational evaluation is the evaluation process of characterizing and appraising some aspect of the education enterprise.
Standards for educational evaluation
The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation published three sets of standards for educational evaluations. The Personnel Evaluation Standards was published in 1988, The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd edition) was published in 1994, and The Student Evaluations Standards was published in 2003.
Each publication presents and elaborates a set of standards for use in a variety of educational settings. The standards provide guidelines for designing, implementing, assessing and improving the identified form of evaluation. Each of the standards has been placed in one of four fundamental categories to promote evaluations that are proper, useful, feasible, and accurate.
The Personnel Evaluation Standards
- The propriety standards require that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved in.
- The utility standards are intended to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential.
- The feasibility standards call for evaluation systems that are as easy to implement as possible, efficient in their use of time and resources, adequately funded, and viable from a number of other standpoints.
- The accuracy standards require that the obtained information be technically accurate and that conclusions be linked logically to the data.
The Program Evaluation Standards
- The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users.
- The feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal.
- The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results.
- The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated.
The Student Evaluation Standards
- The Propriety standards help ensure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation.
- The Utility standards promote the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations.
- The Feasibility standards help ensure that student evaluations are practical; viable; cost-effective; and culturally, socially, and politically appropriate.
- The Accuracy standards help ensure that student evaluations will provide sound, accurate, and credible information about student learning and performance.
See also
- Assessment
- Competency evaluation
- Evaluation methods and techniques
- Grading
- Performance evaluation
- Program evaluation
- Wikiversity: Educational standards organisations
Notes and references
- Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The Student Evaluation Standards: How to Improve Evaluations of Students. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
External links
- American Evaluation Association
- American Educational Research Association
- Assessment in Higher Education web site.
- Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation
 | This article relating to education is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |