| Revision as of 20:44, 3 April 2011 editHelloAnnyong (talk | contribs)Administrators42,954 edits Marking case as closed← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 4 April 2011 edit undoAmandaNP (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators45,695 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Hetoum I/ArchiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Hetoum I}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Hetoum I}} | ||
| {{SPI case status|close}} | |||
| =====<big>07 March 2011</big>===== | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Ali55te}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Aram-van}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| <small>''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>"''</small> | |||
| The account of {{User|Ali55te}} appears to be a sleeper sock, and is highly suspicious. It was registered almost one year ago, on March 26, 2010, but started editing only recently, almost immediately engaging in edit wars in arbitration covered articles. He continued edit war waged by Aram-van on ] article after Aram-van was placed on revert restriction. It could be Aram-van or someone else evading arbitration restriction. It is also of note that Ali55te used anti-vandalism tool to edit war: It is strange for a new user to be aware of such tools. ]] 19:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC) ]] 19:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| Grandmaster is intentionally making a fake case here. First of all if you check all the edits that I make, eventually a wikipedia administrator or moderator approved my edits and saved the articles. If you check the history of Grandmaster he is consistently doing bad faith edits on Armenia related articles. I can not believe that such a person can be made a reviewer at wikiopedia. I think his current status at wikipedia must be reconsidered. | |||
| Now let's look at this claim : "It is also of note that Ali55te used anti-vandalism tool to edit war: It is strange for a new user to be aware of such tools" | |||
| You can clearly see his bad faith in this claim. | |||
| If you check the history of Duduk article Grandmaster continously tried to vandalise the article and when he understood that he can not vandalise it further because of me he started this nonsense sockpuppet investigation. I hope a wikipedia administrator will investigate this case from his edits. ] (]) 01:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : My first intention for creating an account was to add images related to the vandalism happened in the ] and that time I found out that wikipedia have strict copy-right policies related to pictures and I was really busy that time I haven't started editting. This year I have enough time to look at wikipeda so I have started to do edits. I don't have any idea who is hetoum or aramvan, you can do whatever technical investigation you want I am 100% sure of myself. I insist that the bad faith edits that has been made by ] and the others to the Armenia related articles should be investigated deeply. ] (]) 03:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::: In addition according to the sockpuppet investigation guidience : VI. Notify all the users you are accusing using the template (sockpuppet template). Today I see the case by chance when I look at my userpage. I haven't added my userpage to my watchlist. The entry was made by the user Ebe123 not by the accuser itself. I hereby request again from administrators to invetigate this case as a bad faith from Grandmaster. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| I want to enlighten more about the issue. The accuser Grandmaster has involved in a disruptive editing process in the ] article which he points it in his evidence list. I will explain simply how annoying the situation in this disruptive editing. If you check this BBC news from 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4328285.stm You can see that Turkish government banned to use the latin words like armeniaca, kurdistaniaca from the biological names of the animals and species and plants. It is so funny. These names had been evolved for maybe 1500 - 2000 years of historical events. Now some people with the same mentality trying to edit Armenia related articles. When I check the ] article after I actively start to edit in wikipedia I see that some people intentionally trying to hide the origin of the insturment because the origin of the insturment is Armenian. So, I first added a reference from UNESCO website then they continued to revert it. Eventually I added a publication from UNESCO which is from a conference where the major countries from Caucassia came together like Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia. In the publication it is clearly mentioned that the insturment has Armenian origins. But then they again reverted it. After that I reverted the change and tagged it as vandalism because it was becoming a serious issue as the BBC news. Then the Grandmaster started this fake sockpuppet investigation with a hope that I will be banned. He did not even put a notice in my discussion board about the investigation. He did this because he realized that he can not disruptively edit the Duduk article anymore I was actively revealing his and some others effort. | |||
| I hope I managed to explain the seriousness of this issue. After this case is close I will transfer this case to an administrative board because I know this section is not suitable for this kind of actions. Thank you. ] (]) 03:36, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| By the way I am very open to any kind of checkuser investigation. ] (]) 03:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| *I find it unlikely, but I'm endorsing for a CU against {{User|Aram-van}}. — ] <sup>]</sup> 14:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Ali55te and Aram-van are {{unrelated}}. Also, Hetoum I is {{staleip}}. –] 19:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| *Fine. Closing this for now, then. — ] <sup>]</sup> 20:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 4 April 2011
Hetoum I
Hetoum I (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Hetoum I/Archive.