Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Science fact (second nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:01, 6 March 2006 editFan-1967 (talk | contribs)21,751 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 05:59, 6 March 2006 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,259 edits []: Delete voteNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
::Sounds more like some sort of conspiracy theory article to me, rather than fact. --] 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC) ::Sounds more like some sort of conspiracy theory article to me, rather than fact. --] 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Dicdef. Only common use of the phrase is in ] magazine, which bills itself as "Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact". ] 04:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Dicdef. Only common use of the phrase is in ] magazine, which bills itself as "Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact". ] 04:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', dicdef. ] 05:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:59, 6 March 2006

Science fact

Second nomination. See discussions here and here / Ezeu 23:39, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Sounds more like some sort of conspiracy theory article to me, rather than fact. --日本穣 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)