Misplaced Pages

User talk:82.15.17.152: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:55, 6 March 2006 edit82.15.17.152 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:58, 6 March 2006 edit undo82.15.17.152 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


# No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age. # No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age.
# ] is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included, if the Pope's legal name is mentioned why not this person? Hiding behind a fake name, which is not even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. # ] is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included; if the ]'s legal name is mentioned why not this person's? Hiding behind a fake name, which wasn'y even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. It is tantamount to strenthening his cult and assisting him in his con work.
# Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at ]'s behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people? # Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at ]'s behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people?



Revision as of 09:58, 6 March 2006

  1. Please stop removing content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shanel 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. ~ PseudoSudo 13:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. RexNL 01:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocked.

You have been blocked. Please stop vandalizing.--Jondel 02:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

82.15.17.152 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Why would anyone with his right mind let this cultist, who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan and claims to be a Neuroscientist, muddle Misplaced Pages's credibility by inserting the following words in an article supposedly based on facts?

Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath, a Living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age, travels the world at the behest of Mahavatar Babaji.

So, does everyone here agree that the person who calls himself Gurunath is a Himalayan Siddha Master and that he travels the world at the behest of Mahavatar Babaji? Do those claims constitute fact? Why not reword them in a more realistic and socially acceptable way like: Another Indian teacher who calls himself Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath claims to be a living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age and travels the world to teach his own version of Kriya Yoga?

Why did I say that it should it be rendered like that?

  1. No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age.
  2. Yogiraj Siddhanath Gurunath is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included; if the Pope's legal name is mentioned why not this person's? Hiding behind a fake name, which wasn'y even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. It is tantamount to strenthening his cult and assisting him in his con work.
  3. Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at Mahavatar Babaji's behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people?

Allowing the person who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan to promote his cult and god here in this way makes a tabloid out of Misplaced Pages, it further weakens its credibility.

Category: