| Revision as of 15:06, 6 March 2006 editSiva1979 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,266 edits →[]: keep vote← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:07, 6 March 2006 edit undoAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits →[]: mergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' for now, with no prejudice should a decent article be written. ] 09:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' for now, with no prejudice should a decent article be written. ] 09:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per Henrik. --<font style="background:gold">]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">]</font></sup> 15:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' per Henrik. --<font style="background:gold">]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">]</font></sup> 15:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' Agree with Fan1967 -- ] 15:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:07, 6 March 2006
Canadian immigration
Advertisement, nonsense, or plain unsalvagable. Prod was removed, so it's here. Grocer 03:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Grocer 03:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect to Citizenship and Immigration Canada. There's room for more content on this, but it belongs there. Fan1967 05:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Canada's great! I wouldn't merge, the content is spurious. -- Samir ∙ C
06:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep (or possibly Merge per Fan1967). I dont belive the content is unsalvagable, but it needs a lot of work. Countries various immigration policies are interesting enough to deserve an article, but it must of course be better than this. Henrik 07:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for now, with no prejudice should a decent article be written. Calwatch 09:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Henrik. --Siva1979 15:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Merge Agree with Fan1967 -- Alpha269 15:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
