| Revision as of 15:42, 6 March 2006 editVizjim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:22, 6 March 2006 edit undoJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *'''Delete''' not notable -- ] 15:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' not notable -- ] 15:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Gang is mentioned gang identification website, local news comment piece, reputable local newspaper, and generally all over Google search]. They are real and like the hilariously inadequate ] they should be ‘’’kept’’’, but the copy should be edited mercilessly. ] 15:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *Gang is mentioned gang identification website, local news comment piece, reputable local newspaper, and generally all over Google search]. They are real and like the hilariously inadequate ] they should be ‘’’kept’’’, but the copy should be edited mercilessly. ] 15:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' per Vizjim. ] 16:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:22, 6 March 2006
Masters of Destruction
Article currently totally uncited. Google news shows one hit and vanilla google shows nothing to indicate they are encyclopedic outside being one of over twenty gangs mentioned in a local paper. Delete. - brenneman 13:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, unless sources are cited. --Terence Ong 13:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable -- Alpha269 15:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Gang is mentioned this gang identification website, this local news comment piece, this reputable local newspaper, and generally all over this Google search]. They are real and like the hilariously inadequate Oriental Ruthless Boys they should be ‘’’kept’’’, but the copy should be edited mercilessly. Vizjim 15:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Vizjim. JoshuaZ 16:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)