| Revision as of 09:16, 6 March 2006 edit164.107.197.58 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:40, 6 March 2006 edit undoDawson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,948 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| look at the copperhead page. It would be nice if articles on snakes all followed that format. Much easier to read. | look at the copperhead page. It would be nice if articles on snakes all followed that format. Much easier to read. | ||
| :Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and ] agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -] 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:40, 6 March 2006
um, this is a good article-User:Carsoncocars
look at the copperhead page. It would be nice if articles on snakes all followed that format. Much easier to read.
- Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and WP:Guide to writing better articles agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -Dawson 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)