Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Article purity: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:09, 5 March 2006 editDbtfz (talk | contribs)5,475 edits []: d← Previous edit Revision as of 16:57, 6 March 2006 edit undoAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits []: deleteNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Delete''', useless. --]]</font>]] 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', useless. --]]</font>]] 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Per above. -- ] 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:57, 6 March 2006

Article purity

I find very little instances of this terminology to mean as such. Unless it means "purity of an article", which we don't need an encyclopedia or dictionary for! Delete -- Perfecto Canada 08:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)