| Revision as of 22:07, 2 March 2006 editKusma (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators59,514 edits →[]: del & prodcomment← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:48, 7 March 2006 edit undoAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits →[]: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Garbage. --] ] 22:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Garbage. --] ] 22:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per Adrian. -- ] 00:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{PRODcomment}} ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | {{PRODcomment}} ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 7 March 2006
Share-aunt
Delete No google results found for such a phrase Wickethewok 21:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable and/or original research / dictdef / protoneologism . — User:Adrian/zap2.js 22:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Garbage. --Krashlandon (e) 22:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kusma (討論) 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Adrian. -- Alpha269 00:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- ~~~~