| Revision as of 12:52, 7 March 2006 view sourceCeraurus (talk | contribs)230 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:05, 7 March 2006 view source Isotelus (talk | contribs)27 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Marsden2 | http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Marsden2 | ||
| The "Speedy Keep" decision was a blatant attamept to prevent discussion. This article is libelous and leaves Misplaced Pages open to a lawsuit. It is am attempt to smear the subject. It is filled with POV, slected facts. Please read "talk" page before voting to see the objections raised. Several Canadian Misplaced Pages editors refuse to do anything to restrain the stalking of the subject of this article by the authors] 12:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | The "Speedy Keep" decision was a blatant attamept to prevent discussion. This article is libelous and leaves Misplaced Pages open to a lawsuit. It is am attempt to smear the subject. It is filled with POV, slected facts. Please read "talk" page before voting to see the objections raised. Several Canadian Misplaced Pages editors refuse to do anything to restrain the stalking of the subject of this article by the authors ] 12:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Delete | Delete | ||
| One of the worst articles on Misplaced Pages. Point of view is so blatant and negative that it's beyond fixing and a whole new article is needed. Delete |
One of the worst articles on Misplaced Pages. Point of view is so blatant and negative that it's beyond fixing and a whole new article is needed. Delete Mark Bourrie 12:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:05, 7 March 2006
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Marsden2
The "Speedy Keep" decision was a blatant attamept to prevent discussion. This article is libelous and leaves Misplaced Pages open to a lawsuit. It is am attempt to smear the subject. It is filled with POV, slected facts. Please read "talk" page before voting to see the objections raised. Several Canadian Misplaced Pages editors refuse to do anything to restrain the stalking of the subject of this article by the authors Isotelus 12:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete
One of the worst articles on Misplaced Pages. Point of view is so blatant and negative that it's beyond fixing and a whole new article is needed. Delete Mark Bourrie 12:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)