| Revision as of 08:31, 3 May 2011 view sourceHomo Logica (talk | contribs)310 edits →Terrorist Organizations: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:13, 3 May 2011 view source Chesdovi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users22,098 edits →Tiferet Yisrael Synagogue: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Ongoing discussions and ] (]) 08:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | Ongoing discussions and ] (]) 08:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Tiferet Yisrael Synagogue == | |||
| That's so weird. I was about to make changes here myself. Was thinking of changing "Franz Joseph, concerned with protecting the rights of his subjects living in the Holy Land," to "living in Palestine." What do you think? ] (]) 15:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:13, 3 May 2011
/
Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Misplaced Pages. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Misplaced Pages contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
ALA mark
I saw that you edited Arab Liberation Army. Would you mind coming and giving your mind on commons : here. This discussion has been re-opened. Many thanks. Noisetier (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Man Down
About Man Down, the 50 cent song is not a single so there is no need to specify whether the article for a single named Man Down is of Rihanna or 50 Cent. 50 Cent did nto release it as a single. for example S&M is a song by both Rihanna and Thin Lizzy (Check here: S&M) but the article for the single is S&M (song) only not S&M (Rihanna song). If you try to change the article to Man Down (Rihanna song), it will be reported to wiki as vandalism and your account can be blocked. So please let Man Down (song) stay in its place Syedwaheedhussain (talk) 21:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Consensus - what is consensus
Your postings are highly partisan - and I have only read what you have said via a vis Merom Golan & Neve Ativ. For me to be criticised as "partisan" is of gross double standard.
Now, what is "consensus" to you? That enough people agree on a point? What is the selection process for said editors to whom you attribute this "consensus"? Need I cite a litany of issues to which "consensus" was achieved in history, that later proved completely unreliable and just plain wrong?
Your citations are weak. Do said "consensus" editors really, honestly believe that - (a) BBC's page on the Geneva Conventions & the "Settlements"/"Occupation" are impartial, objective and legally sound? (b) Tom Segev is equally impartial & objective?
I believe you should have cited the sources directly: have you read the Geneva Conventions thoroughly?
You are in a very powerful position: use it wisely. Or do you think Israel's being forced to cede the Golan to Assad is a minor issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnflalor (talk • contribs) 10:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
David ben Solomon ibn Abi Zimra
He spent about half his life in Palestine and led the Jewish community there. There is no good reason why he cannot be called Palestinian. You are happy to leave the two Egyptian categroies, revaling you are editing purely to push your strange POV. I guess you are not XXXish since you were born in xxxxx? Chesdovi (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Chesdovi has created and populated Category:Medieval Jews in Palestine, Category:Palestinian geonim, Category:13th-century Palestinian rabbis, and all other per century categories. All of this without discussion, and in part after we had already filed our protest on his talk page. I have depopulated them again. In addition, I hope you will support me if I have to take him to wp:ani. And did you see this Cfd, where another of his ideas is under discussion? This spray of categories he created should be stopped. Debresser (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- The issue is on WP:ANI now. See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Palliomine. Debresser (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- David ben Solomon ibn Abi Zimra is called Egyptian. But is he of Egyptian blood? No. He is of Spanish descent. So why have the EJ labelled him Egyptian? This clearly is not about ethnicity, possible not even about natioanlity. It is about defined where a person is generally regar4ded as being from. Although Zimra was spanish, he spent many years in egypt, therefore it is acceptable to refer to him as being from egypt, ie, egyptain. The same rings true for the other places where he spent many years building a reputation, ie. Palestine. (we would not add each counry a person temporary soujourned in for a mere few years) So we have a guy who is both Spanish, (of decsent) and egypatin and Palestinian (of residence). This is the defining parameters of inclusion in these such categories. Chesdovi (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- The issue is on WP:ANI now. See Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Palliomine. Debresser (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Terrorist Organizations
Ongoing discussions Here and Here Homo Logica (talk) 08:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Tiferet Yisrael Synagogue
That's so weird. I was about to make changes here myself. Was thinking of changing "Franz Joseph, concerned with protecting the rights of his subjects living in the Holy Land," to "living in Palestine." What do you think? Chesdovi (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)