Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:42, 5 May 2011

GA John D. Rockefeller

I have placed the article on hold so that you can address several concerns. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Where do we stand on the GA review? Thanks Racepacket (talk) 04:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Can we work together to wrap up the John D. Rockefeller review? Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

It does not appear that you have edited the article for the past 4 or 5 days. Do you want to continue? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

If I don't hear from you in 24 hours, I will have to fail the review. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

We are making progress. Racepacket (talk) 09:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I removed the "more sources" tag from the article. There is still one tag that should be addressed, and then I am ready to pass the article. Thank you for your hard work. Racepacket (talk) 17:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Serbs of Croatia infobox picture

I will undo your changes (once again) and please do not start an edit war, because if you are to look a bit you will see that I am doing what is the best for this article. I also cleaned one image and changed size of a few, in order for the article to look better and cleaner. I do not see a problem in having 12 Serbs in the infobox picture.

mm.srb

Serbs of Croatia

Why are you edit warring on the infobox to have 9 pictures instead of 12? You plainly don't have consensus. Stop it and get consensus.Fainites scribs 14:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Ditto. I see no reason for 8 people there if they want 12.. Additionally, let's avoid war criminals there as we did on Croats. WHY Dujic for heaven's sake? Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems like you're trying to depict the Serbs of Croatia, at least in part, as Chetniks? And, ironically, that concept and goal may actually coincide with those of the Chetnik supporters here on Wiki, who regard them as "good guys" (in spite of a mountain of sources and evidence). Both the Chetniks and the Ustase were organizations with ethnic cleansing as open policy. War criminals from neither of them should not be included. Ironically, instead of giving me a hand in dispelling the myth of Chetniks as "heroes" that is being pushed on Wiki very forcefully, you're actually aiding that point of view by essentially proposing Chetnik promotion. I really do not think that is your intention? :) --DIREKTOR 15:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivica Đikić

The article Ivica Đikić has been proposed for deletion because under Misplaced Pages policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

Unsourced

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners or ask at Misplaced Pages:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GregorB (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

andric

The croats have ivo andric in their infobox. If he can be there, then what is preventing him from being in the infobox of serbs or bosniaks? (LAz17 (talk) 00:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)).