Misplaced Pages

Battle of Mishmar HaEmek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:01, 5 May 2011 view sourceSnakeswithfeet (talk | contribs)502 edits The Jewish counter-offensive: expanded from Morris 2004← Previous edit Revision as of 05:04, 5 May 2011 view source Snakeswithfeet (talk | contribs)502 edits Aftermath: removed unnecessary inflammatory commentNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


==Aftermath== ==Aftermath==
All of the Palestinian villages captured were destroyed shortly after being captured. ] of the ] wrote: "their inhabitants are afraid and flee like mice."<ref>Morris,(1987), page 117.</ref> Members of the left wing ], to which Mishwar HaEmek was affiliated, were accused of hypocrisy in following months when they complained about the destruction of Arab villages, because it was said that in this case it was what they had called for.<ref>Morris,(1987), pages 116, 324.</ref> On 14 April the Middle East scholar and member of Mapam, Eliezer Bauer (Be'eri), wrote the following: <blockquote>Of course in a cruel war such as we are engaged in, one cannot act with kid gloves. But there are still rules in war which a civilized people tries to follow... When the village was conquered, the villagers tried to escape and save themselves by fleeing to the fields of the Valley. Forces from nearby settlements sortied out and outflanked them. There were exchanges of fire in which several of these Arabs were killed . And these were not gang members as was later written in ] but defenceless, beaten peasants. Only members of my kibbutz ] took prisoners... Also in the village, when adult males were discovered hiding hours after the end of battle -they were killed. It is said that there were cases of rape Of the property in the houses and farm animals they took what they could: One took a kettle for coffee, another a horse, a third a cow.. if every farmer from a nearby moshave ] ] takes part in looting, that is nothing but theft..."<ref>Morris, 2004, p 243, and note 610, p. 297</ref></blockquote> All of the Palestinian villages captured were destroyed shortly after being captured. Members of the left wing ], to which Mishwar HaEmek was affiliated, were accused of hypocrisy in following months when they complained about the destruction of Arab villages, because it was said that in this case it was what they had called for.<ref>Morris,(1987), pages 116, 324.</ref> On 14 April the Middle East scholar and member of Mapam, Eliezer Bauer (Be'eri), wrote the following: <blockquote>Of course in a cruel war such as we are engaged in, one cannot act with kid gloves. But there are still rules in war which a civilized people tries to follow... When the village was conquered, the villagers tried to escape and save themselves by fleeing to the fields of the Valley. Forces from nearby settlements sortied out and outflanked them. There were exchanges of fire in which several of these Arabs were killed . And these were not gang members as was later written in ] but defenceless, beaten peasants. Only members of my kibbutz ] took prisoners... Also in the village, when adult males were discovered hiding hours after the end of battle -they were killed. It is said that there were cases of rape Of the property in the houses and farm animals they took what they could: One took a kettle for coffee, another a horse, a third a cow.. if every farmer from a nearby moshave ] ] takes part in looting, that is nothing but theft..."<ref>Morris, 2004, p 243, and note 610, p. 297</ref></blockquote>
In early August "The Committee for the Cultivation of Abandoned Lands" began the leasing of village land to Jewish settlements "for periods of six months to a year."<ref>Morris,(1987), page 175.</ref><br />Almost all the forces available to the ALA took part in the attack on Mishmar HaEmek and it was their "final significant contribution" in the conflict. <ref>Ilan Pappe,'The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947-1951'. ISBN 1-85043-819-6. Page 83.</ref> ], commander of the ]ian ] described the ALA attack as a "fiasco" and wrote that after their defeat the ALA's "morale and enthusiasm waned (and) the LIberation Army became more interested in looting - often from the Arabs of Palestine".<ref>Lieutenant-General Sir John Bagot Glubb, K.C.B, C.M.G., D.S.O., O.B.E., M.C., "A Soldier with the Arabs". Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1957. Page 80. A professional soldier's scorn for irregulars?</ref> In early August "The Committee for the Cultivation of Abandoned Lands" began the leasing of village land to Jewish settlements "for periods of six months to a year."<ref>Morris,(1987), page 175.</ref><br />Almost all the forces available to the ALA took part in the attack on Mishmar HaEmek and it was their "final significant contribution" in the conflict. <ref>Ilan Pappe,'The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947-1951'. ISBN 1-85043-819-6. Page 83.</ref> ], commander of the ]ian ] described the ALA attack as a "fiasco" and wrote that after their defeat the ALA's "morale and enthusiasm waned (and) the LIberation Army became more interested in looting - often from the Arabs of Palestine".<ref>Lieutenant-General Sir John Bagot Glubb, K.C.B, C.M.G., D.S.O., O.B.E., M.C., "A Soldier with the Arabs". Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1957. Page 80. A professional soldier's scorn for irregulars?</ref>



Revision as of 05:04, 5 May 2011

Jewish soldiers at the entry of the Mishmar Ha'emek, 1948

The Battle of Mishmar HaEmek refers to a ten-day campaign fought from 4-15 April 1948 between the Arab Liberation Army (Yarmouk Corps) commanded by Fawzi al-Qawuqji and the Haganah (Palmach and HISH) commanded by Yitzhak Sadeh. The campaign was initiated by al-Qawyqji for the purpose of taking over the Jewish settlement of Mishmar HaEmek just west of Megiddo. It was strategically placed beside the main road between Jenin and Haifa.

In 1947 it had a population of 550.

Battle

On 4 April 1948, about 1,000 Arab Liberation Army (ALA) militiamen launched an attack on the kibbutz. They were initially opposed by 170 Jews and later, two companies of the Palmach, "less than 300 boys." The attack began with an artillery barrage from seven artillery pieces supplied by the Syrian Army. This was the first time that artillery was used in the war. For five days, the Arab force shelled the village from a distance of 800 yards away. The Jews had one machine gun and "not enough rifles for all the male settlers," Following the shelling, an infantry attack was launched, but it was "stopped in its tracks along the fence of the village by defenders' fire." That night a company from the Haganah's Golani Brigade "infiltrated into the village" to assist the Haganah militia who had repelled the attack. Mishmar HaEmek was shelled again all day on 5 April and Jewish reinforcements arrived during the following night. At the same time the 1st battalion of the Palmach began assembling at Ein Hashofet Template:Mi to km to the west. Kaukji also brought reinforcements from Jenin.

On 7 April a British unit suggested a ceasefire and the ALA "agreed to cease the attack" for 24 hours snd "called on the kibbutz to surrender its weapons and submit to Arab rule. During this 24-hour period the kibbutz was able to evacuate the women and children. The ceasefire was rejected by David Ben Gurion and the Haganah General Staff, who decided instead to launch a counter-attack "to clear the ALA and the local Arab inhabitants out of the area, and to level the villages in order to permanently remove the threat to Mishmar Ha'emek," and to make it more difficult for an invading force from Jenin to push through to Haifa. "It began as a desperate Jewish defence and turned into a Haganah offensive conforming to Plan Dalet guidelines."

The Jewish counter-offensive

Ghubayya al-Tahta, Mishmar HaEmek's closest neighbour to the south, Ghubayya al-Fauqa and Khirbet Beit Ras were captured on 8/9 April. Ghubayya al-Tahta was blown up immediately, the other two were blown up "piecemeal in the following days". Most of the residents fled before or during the attacks. According to Qawuqji's memoirs a "pitched battle" took place around these villages with "house to house fighting". According to Morris, the ALA units "often retreated first, abandoning the villagers." On 10 April Haganah units took Abu Shusha, a few hundred yards north of the kibbutz, expelling the remaining villagers and destroying the village that night. On 12 April Palmach soldiers took Al-Kafrayn and Abu Zurayq, they found no-one in the first village but took "fifteen adult males and some 200 women and children" captive in the second. The women and children were expelled. 30 houses in Al-Kafrayn were blown up that day and some at Abu Zurayq that night. Abu Zurayq was completely destroyed by 15 April. On 12 April, al-Qawuqji and his troops were almost encircled and they had to withdraw in haste to Jenin. During the night of 12-13 April Palmach units took the villages of Al-Mansi and Naghnaghiya which were blown up in the following days. On 19 April Al-Kafrayn was used by a Palmach unit for training and then "blown up completely." According to Benny Morris, "Most of the villagers reached the Jenin area and sheltered in makeshift tents."

Aftermath

All of the Palestinian villages captured were destroyed shortly after being captured. Members of the left wing Mapam, to which Mishwar HaEmek was affiliated, were accused of hypocrisy in following months when they complained about the destruction of Arab villages, because it was said that in this case it was what they had called for. On 14 April the Middle East scholar and member of Mapam, Eliezer Bauer (Be'eri), wrote the following:

Of course in a cruel war such as we are engaged in, one cannot act with kid gloves. But there are still rules in war which a civilized people tries to follow... When the village was conquered, the villagers tried to escape and save themselves by fleeing to the fields of the Valley. Forces from nearby settlements sortied out and outflanked them. There were exchanges of fire in which several of these Arabs were killed . And these were not gang members as was later written in Al Hamishmar but defenceless, beaten peasants. Only members of my kibbutz Hazorea took prisoners... Also in the village, when adult males were discovered hiding hours after the end of battle -they were killed. It is said that there were cases of rape Of the property in the houses and farm animals they took what they could: One took a kettle for coffee, another a horse, a third a cow.. if every farmer from a nearby moshave takes part in looting, that is nothing but theft..."

In early August "The Committee for the Cultivation of Abandoned Lands" began the leasing of village land to Jewish settlements "for periods of six months to a year."
Almost all the forces available to the ALA took part in the attack on Mishmar HaEmek and it was their "final significant contribution" in the conflict. Glubb Pasha, commander of the TransJordanian Arab Legion described the ALA attack as a "fiasco" and wrote that after their defeat the ALA's "morale and enthusiasm waned (and) the LIberation Army became more interested in looting - often from the Arabs of Palestine".

Notes

  1. Morris, 1984. Page 115."The battle began on 4 April when the ALA shelled and attempted to take Mishmar Ha'emek...which the Haganah commanders regarded as one of the main likely routes for a major Arab attack on the Yishuv on or after 15 May."
  2. Jewish National Fund (1949). Jewish Villages in Israel. Jerusalem: Hamadpis Liphshitz Press.
  3. Chaim Herzog, "The Arab-Israeli Wars".ISBN 0-85368-367-0. Page 27: They came from the "Kadisia" brigade with units from the 1st "Yarmuk" battalion commanded by Mohammed Safa and men from the "Hittin" brigade, commander Madul Abas. Morris notes that the ALA had a poor relationship with local villagers. Benny Morris,"The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem", ISBN 0-521-33028-9. 1987. Page 115. Quotes a report dated 12 April by Lt. Colonel C. A. Peel: "The officers of the ALA treat the locals like dirt."
  4. Kimche, (1950), p. 215
  5. Larry Collins/Dominique Lapierre, "O Jerusalem". History Book Club, London, 1972 (hb). Page 281. They count seven 75 millimeter and three 105 millimeter guns.
  6. Kimche, 1950 pg 215.
  7. Kimche, 1960. p. 100
  8. Herzog. page 27.
  9. Kimche, 1960 p.101
  10. Morris, (1984) page 115.
  11. Morris, (2004) p.240
  12. Morris, (2004) p.240
  13. Morris, (1984) page 116.
  14. Morris, (2004) p.241
  15. Morris, (1987), Page 115.
  16. Morris,(1987), pages 116, 158.
  17. Populations according to the 1945 "Survey of villages": Ghubayya al-Tahta + al-Fauqa = 1,130. ("All that remains", ISBN 0-88728-224-5). The Khirbet not mentioned.
  18. Memoirs 1948 (pub. 1972) translated in Journal of Palestine Studies (4):27-58, quoted in "All that remains", page 160.
  19. Morris, (2004) pp. 241-242
  20. Morris, (1987), pages 116,117."Survey of villages": Population Abu Shusha = 720.
  21. Morris, (1987), page 117. "Survey of villages": Populations: Al-Kafrayn = 920, Abu Zurayq = 550.
  22. Morris, (2004) p.242
  23. Herzog, page 28.
  24. "Survey of villages": Populations: Al-Mansi = 90, Naghnaghiya = 1,130.
  25. Morris,(1987), pages 117, 159.
  26. Morris, (2004) p.242.
  27. Morris,(1987), pages 116, 324.
  28. Morris, 2004, p 243, and note 610, p. 297
  29. Morris,(1987), page 175.
  30. Ilan Pappe,'The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947-1951'. ISBN 1-85043-819-6. Page 83.
  31. Lieutenant-General Sir John Bagot Glubb, K.C.B, C.M.G., D.S.O., O.B.E., M.C., "A Soldier with the Arabs". Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1957. Page 80. A professional soldier's scorn for irregulars?

References

  • Herzog, C., & Gazit, S. (2005). The Arab-Israeli wars: War and peace in the Middle East from the 1948 War of Independence to the present. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Kimche, J. (1950). Seven fallen pillars. The Middle East: 1915-1950, by Jon Kimche. London: Secker and Warburg.
  • Kimche, J., & Kimche, D. (1960). A clash of destinies: The Arab-Jewish War and the founding of the State of Israel. New York: Praeger.
  • Morris, B. (1987). The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem, 1947-1949. Cambridge
Israeli military operations in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War
Pre-IDF
IDF

Category: