| Revision as of 04:18, 8 March 2006 editJondel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers17,313 edits →Blocked.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:28, 8 March 2006 edit undo82.15.17.152 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| # Please stop removing content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered ]. If you want to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2a (Second level warning) --> ] 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| # Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to ], you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test3-n (Third level warning) --> ~ ] 13:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| #] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> ] 01:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked.== | |||
| You have been blocked. Please stop vandalizing.--] 02:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock}} | |||
| Why would anyone with his right mind let this cultist, who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan and claims to be a Neuroscientist, muddle Misplaced Pages's credibility by inserting the following words in an article supposedly based on facts? | |||
| ], a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age, travels the world at the behest of ]. | |||
| So, does everyone here agree that the person who calls himself Gurunath is a Himalayan ] Master and that he travels the world at the behest of ]? Do those claims constitute fact? Why not reword them in a more realistic and socially acceptable way like: Another ] teacher who calls himself ] claims to be a living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age and travels the world to teach his own version of ]? | |||
| Why did I say that it should it be rendered like that? | |||
| # No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan ] Master in the modern age. | |||
| # ] is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included; if the ]'s legal name is mentioned why not this person's? Hiding behind a fake name, which wasn'y even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. It is tantamount to strenthening his cult and assisting him in his con work. | |||
| # Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at ]'s behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people? | |||
| Allowing the person who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan to promote his cult and god here in this way makes a tabloid out of Misplaced Pages, it further weakens its credibility. | |||
| Hi! Whoever you are, if you want to gain credibility, be more accountable like registering and not inserting statements like --] 04:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||