Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Les Enfants D'ombre: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:39, 8 March 2006 editTree Biting Conspiracy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,692 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 12:39, 8 March 2006 edit undoTree Biting Conspiracy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,692 edits []Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Delete''' per nom. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ]. ] 11:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ]. ] 11:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above

Revision as of 12:39, 8 March 2006

Les Enfants D'ombre

Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. Kareeser| 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

*cocks head* Come again? ;x — User:Adrian/zap2.js 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)