| Revision as of 12:41, 8 March 2006 editTree Biting Conspiracy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers13,692 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:54, 8 March 2006 edit undoStaxringold (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,681 edits →[]: DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. Good find, Melchoir. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. Good find, Melchoir. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom, as POV fork --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom, as POV fork --]<small><sup>] ] ]</sup></small> 12:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fork. ] 12:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:54, 8 March 2006
New Kalachakra
I am ignorant of the dispute from which this article arose. That said, it's a fork. Melchoir 00:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as pov fork of Kalachakra, or smerge the differences. Metta Bubble 00:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. Green Giant 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete pork --Grocer 06:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as POV fork; I fail to see why the article must "be preserved pending an inquiry for Crimes against Humanity concerning the banning of the Jonangpas in the 17th century, under the auspices of the ICC in The Hague, and with the help of Amnesty International and the UN human rights". Surely the history of Kalachakra would suffice if this were the case. Jude(talk,contribs) 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. --Terence Ong 08:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Good find, Melchoir. savidan 08:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, as POV fork --TBC 12:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Fork. Staxringold 12:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)