| Revision as of 05:44, 11 May 2011 editBarong (talk | contribs)274 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:33, 11 May 2011 edit undoBarong (talk | contribs)274 edits +unblockNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| * +missing notification ;) | * +missing notification ;) | ||
| ] 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ] 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == trolling == | |||
| trolling: {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504313|428035461|1}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504478|428504453|2}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504486|428504478|3}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504521|428504486|4}} | trolling: {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504313|428035461|1}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504478|428504453|2}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504486|428504478|3}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504521|428504486|4}} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
| Byte me, grawp/b-tards. ] 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | Byte me, grawp/b-tards. ] 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == unblock == | |||
| {{unblock|<p>This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now ], thus the blocks here, and on commons are not necessary.</p><p>What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.</p>}} | |||
| --] 08:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 11 May 2011
If I've misunderstood what was expected, people should feel free to reverse my block.—Kww(talk) 02:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- The account has been globally locked by a steward. Risker (talk) 02:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sory Risker, I can'r be doing with all this; you are just going to have to go and find him, I need him to sort out my IT problems. No imediate hurry, first thing tomorrow morning will be fine. One despairs, one really does. Giacomo Returned 21:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Jack, whaa? /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, this really sucks. :( Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Help
Need help with my User Page. I see you're blocked. Contact me off wiki if you get this Minor4th 01:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Jack Merridew unban
- +missing notification ;)
Barong 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
trolling
Byte me, grawp/b-tards. Barong 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
unblock
Jack Merridew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now sul:locked, thus the blocks here, and on commons are not necessary.
What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=<p>This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now ], thus the blocks here, and on commons are not necessary.</p><p>What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.</p> |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=<p>This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now ], thus the blocks here, and on commons are not necessary.</p><p>What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.</p> |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=<p>This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now ], thus the blocks here, and on commons are not necessary.</p><p>What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.</p> |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
--Barong 08:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Category: