| Revision as of 10:08, 11 May 2011 editBarong (talk | contribs)274 edits →unblock: ++← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:13, 11 May 2011 edit undoDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| : The CU-list should have gotten a clarification from the CU on the other end of that trip (a 24h flight;) Anyway, see ] for a bunch of folks not doubting this. This was not an ac-level block and so an unblock should not need to be at that level, either. And from a tech data level, I'm using a few more user agents but the same laptop. Iz me ;) ] 10:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | : The CU-list should have gotten a clarification from the CU on the other end of that trip (a 24h flight;) Anyway, see ] for a bunch of folks not doubting this. This was not an ac-level block and so an unblock should not need to be at that level, either. And from a tech data level, I'm using a few more user agents but the same laptop. Iz me ;) ] 10:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::Both the strings "Merridew" and "Barong" return no results for this year, with the latter returning no results at all. I'm subscribed to both the checkuser and functionaries lists so if something was sent to them, I would have got it. But no matter, as my opinion is that the technical evidence supports your claim. Someone else will have to evaluate your unblock request though, as I prefer not to act as both an admin and a checkuser in the same case where possible. --] ] 10:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:13, 11 May 2011
If I've misunderstood what was expected, people should feel free to reverse my block.—Kww(talk) 02:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- The account has been globally locked by a steward. Risker (talk) 02:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sory Risker, I can'r be doing with all this; you are just going to have to go and find him, I need him to sort out my IT problems. No imediate hurry, first thing tomorrow morning will be fine. One despairs, one really does. Giacomo Returned 21:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Jack, whaa? /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wow, this really sucks. :( Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Help
Need help with my User Page. I see you're blocked. Contact me off wiki if you get this Minor4th 01:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request for clarification: Jack Merridew unban
- +missing notification ;)
Barong 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
trolling
Byte me, grawp/b-tards. Barong 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
unblock
Jack Merridew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now sul:locked, thus the blocks here, and on commons, are not necessary.
What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.
Decline reason:
You're not the blocked user and as such unblock requests will be ignored. Sorry. 狐 Déan rolla bairille! 09:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
--Barong 08:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Jack Merridew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I am. Ask any arb or CU. This is not in doubt.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yes, I am. Ask any arb or CU. This is not in doubt. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes, I am. Ask any arb or CU. This is not in doubt. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes, I am. Ask any arb or CU. This is not in doubt. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
--Barong 09:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
You say that any checkuser should be able to verify it, but I've not had any emails in 2011 that contain the string "Jack Merridew" and checkuser indicates that you appear to have moved across the world since you lasted edited through this account. However, based on the other technical data that's available, it does seem quite likely that you are who you say you are. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 09:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- The CU-list should have gotten a clarification from the CU on the other end of that trip (a 24h flight;) Anyway, see wp:A/R/CL for a bunch of folks not doubting this. This was not an ac-level block and so an unblock should not need to be at that level, either. And from a tech data level, I'm using a few more user agents but the same laptop. Iz me ;) Barong 10:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Both the strings "Merridew" and "Barong" return no results for this year, with the latter returning no results at all. I'm subscribed to both the checkuser and functionaries lists so if something was sent to them, I would have got it. But no matter, as my opinion is that the technical evidence supports your claim. Someone else will have to evaluate your unblock request though, as I prefer not to act as both an admin and a checkuser in the same case where possible. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 10:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)