Revision as of 22:55, 10 April 2011 editWuhwuzdat (talk | contribs)56,587 edits Proposed deletion of Alpha Chi Rho. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:02, 19 May 2011 edit undoDolovis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,916 edits →Request for commentNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]]] 22:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC) | Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]]] 22:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Request for comment == | |||
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the ] page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Misplaced Pages policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of ] and ] continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at ], and your comments would be appreciated. ] (]) 17:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:02, 19 May 2011
The Very Secret Diaries
Back in 2005, you participated in an AFD discussion this article. It was kept, but I have renominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Very Secret Diaries (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 01:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for filing this investigation. It was nice having some outside eyes looking at the issue. Regards, P. D. Cook 05:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alpha Chi Rho
The article Alpha Chi Rho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable, unreferenced
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat 22:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Request for comment
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Misplaced Pages policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)