| Revision as of 16:57, 6 March 2006 editAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 10 March 2006 edit undoMahagaja (talk | contribs)Administrators92,661 edits →[]: closing, deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. ]/<small>'']''</small> 14:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| I find very little instances of this terminology to mean as such. Unless it means "purity of an article", which we don't need an encyclopedia or dictionary for! '''Delete''' -- ] ] 08:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | I find very little instances of this terminology to mean as such. Unless it means "purity of an article", which we don't need an encyclopedia or dictionary for! '''Delete''' -- ] ] 08:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. ]] 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Per above. -- ] 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Per above. -- ] 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | |||
Revision as of 14:34, 10 March 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Angr/talk 14:34, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Article purity
I find very little instances of this terminology to mean as such. Unless it means "purity of an article", which we don't need an encyclopedia or dictionary for! Delete -- Perfecto Canada 08:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Useless article Kyle sb 09:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, useless. --Terence Ong 15:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't appear to be a notable concept. dbtfz 19:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. -- Alpha269 16:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.