| Revision as of 23:30, 31 May 2011 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →Mikemikev's posting on Stormfront← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:57, 1 June 2011 edit undoTraceyR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,025 edits →Juice Plus and Rhode Island Red: The tipping pointNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| *Looking over this issue, it seems to be just a general difference of opinion rather than major behavioral issues. Icerat, it does appear that the community doesn't agree with your viewpoint in general - I understand that sucks, but sometimes you have to agree to disagree - you'll have to abide by the consensus or you'll run into further trouble down the road. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC) | *Looking over this issue, it seems to be just a general difference of opinion rather than major behavioral issues. Icerat, it does appear that the community doesn't agree with your viewpoint in general - I understand that sucks, but sometimes you have to agree to disagree - you'll have to abide by the consensus or you'll run into further trouble down the road. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ] is back in ownership mode at ], in spite of the requests made prior to his 6-month ban that he stop editing the article altogether. The article is a travesty, as many have remarked over the years, and a blot on Misplaced Pages's reputation. I would suggest an admin investigation into the neutrality of the article, leading in all probability to a permanent ban on his activities there, but I have removed the article from my watchlist instead. --] (]) 23:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Mikemikev's posting on Stormfront == | == Mikemikev's posting on Stormfront == | ||
Revision as of 23:57, 1 June 2011
|
pass-out teh baked goodies Gold Hat (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! AdoptionHey. Saw your add on the adoption page and I am looking for someone to show me how to be a more active contributer. I'm on Misplaced Pages all of the time, but I only make edits when I see vandalism or something small when I see incorrect information. This is due, not only to my ineptitude with HTML but also because I'm really just not very sure on what to do to create a full article. Look forward to hearing from you. Mikist4 (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)mikist4
ACCHey Shell, If you have a chance could you come by ACC ? ATM we have 6 request waiting.
User MtkingHi, I need help with a user that is wikihounding all over the place. User:Mtking is actively attempting to deleted articles that I've created that are obviously notable. He as been warned before on his page to stop doing these sort of things but clearly he is ignoring that. Right now he just tag the Business Journals annual award list Forty under 40 with a notability deletion tag just because I created it. To be honest I copied this page example from the page on the Forbes Celebrity 100. The Forty under 40 is mentioned all over the net and in searches... it is hard to miss. To question notability on this subject is really stupid for him to do but I think he is doing it just because I'm associated with the article. He is constantly trying to cause problems for me or get me blocked based on false and miss guided accusations. I would appreciated it if you would seriously just over look this guy and how he has been dealing with me. Good faith is thrown out the window and its all delete first and ask questions later. He and a group of his friends are doing so right now on another page I created about Dr. Paul Dorian (not to be confused with the CEO of similar name).NanaRobins (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Juice Plus and Rhode Island RedHello, just a FYI, I've managed to get myself dragged in to editing the Juice Plus article (with whom I have zero connection at all) plus related articles such as John A. Wise and have been encountering continuous problems with user Rhode Island Red, falsely accusing me of COI, ignoring policies, and generally wikihounding and editing tendentiously. I've just discovered that he/she has previously undertaken a 6 month ban for similar behaviour on the same article and that a year ago you informed him/her that any further editing on the article by him/her would likely result in a block. What would you advise in dealing with them?--Icerat (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Shell, as an outsider I had a look at the Juice Plus article and also a quick look at the BLP/N notice on the Wise article, and I need to comment that Icerat seems to be engaging in a novel interpretation of BLP (according to editors on BLP/N). Icerat seems to think that a source can never be used on the project because it may violate BLP. To defend that he quotes BLPSPS which is a defence that has been leveled at Stephen Barrett and Quackwatch int he past (remember all those loooooooooong discussions - I had thought they were done and dusted years ago). And rather than recognising that he's fighting against consensus, he's engaging in a spot of TE and repeating his points over and over again. I note that Alison has got a flag in to look at the Juice article, but I'm not sure if she should be handling this from an admin perspective. Shot info (talk) 22:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
talk is back in ownership mode at Juice Plus, in spite of the requests made prior to his 6-month ban that he stop editing the article altogether. The article is a travesty, as many have remarked over the years, and a blot on Misplaced Pages's reputation. I would suggest an admin investigation into the neutrality of the article, leading in all probability to a permanent ban on his activities there, but I have removed the article from my watchlist instead. --TraceyR (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC) Mikemikev's posting on StormfrontI noted that checkuser had determined that technical evidence pointed to Comicania as a sockpuppet of Mikemikev. This recent post of Mikemikev on the website Stormfront Is not very encouraging. Mathsci (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
|
gmail.com
