| Revision as of 18:09, 10 March 2006 editHanuman Das (talk | contribs)5,424 edits Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:13, 10 March 2006 edit undoNoToFrauds (talk | contribs)131 edits →WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope ] or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the ] when that sub-sect was a ] sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a ], but not an ], but ''only if he has a valid lineage''. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a ''disputed assertions'' section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Misplaced Pages not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the ] if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –] 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope ] or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the ] when that sub-sect was a ] sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a ], but not an ], but ''only if he has a valid lineage''. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a ''disputed assertions'' section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Misplaced Pages not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the ] if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –] 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning == | |||
| '''If you violate the ], after your fourth ] in 24 hours sysops may block you for up to 24 hours. In cases where multiple parties violate the rule, sysops should treat all sides equally.''' | |||
| Sorry. I don't think you are helping. —] 18:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:13, 10 March 2006
Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath
Well, I will give YGS the benefit of the doubt...for now. I do hope Hamsacharya dan or someone starts a properly objective NPOV page about him. I am doing some research. I think I may have found a classmate of his so I can add his birth name to any new article. (Do you know it?) I too would like to see the question of who YGS's living Nath Guru was and did he explicitly receive parampara? When and where was he initiated? How can he claim to be of the Adi-Nath Sampradaya when that sub-sect was a sannyasin sub-sect? Was he at one time a sannyasin and later renounce those vows? If so, he could be a Nath, but not an Adi Nath, but only if he has a valid lineage. If there are no answers to these questions, there will certainly be a disputed assertions section added to his biography. I personally do not want to do so because I don't want it to look like sectarian infighting, but somebody will have to do it, and do it correctly and without malice or rancor. Of course, all this is separate from the issue of Misplaced Pages not allowing cut & paste from copyrighted sites. Just because HD is a member and teacher doesn't mean he is the copyright agent. I doubt the real copyright agent will release the text under the GFDL if he know what that means. In any case, the current page was not NPOV and so was inappropriate for Wikiepdia. –Adityanath 01:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)