| Revision as of 07:50, 2 June 2011 edit110.139.190.67 (talk) -imdb; unreliable sourceTag: references removed← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:59, 2 June 2011 edit undo110.139.190.67 (talk) ldrNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''''King Leopold's Ghost''''' (1998) is a ] ] book by ] that explores the exploitation of the ] by King ] between 1885 and 1908. |
'''''King Leopold's Ghost''''' (1998) is a ] ] book by ] that explores the exploitation of the ] by King ] between 1885 and 1908.{{sfn|Hochschild|1998}}{{italic title}} | ||
| ⚫ | | last = Hochschild | ||
| ⚫ | | first = Adam | ||
| ⚫ | | authorlink = Adam Hochschild | ||
| | title = | |||
| ⚫ | | publisher = ] | ||
| ⚫ | | series = | ||
| ⚫ | | year = 1998 | ||
| ⚫ | | doi = | ||
| ⚫ | | isbn = ISBN 0-330-49233-0 | ||
| ⚫ | <!-- (Published in the USA by Mariner Books, 1998, ISBN 0-618-00190-5.) --> | ||
| }}</ref>{{italic title}} | |||
| The book aims to increase public awareness of crimes committed by European colonial rulers in Africa. It was refused by nine of the ten U.S. publishing houses to which an outline was submitted, but became an unexpected bestseller and won the prestigious ] for literary style. By 2005, some 400,000 copies were in print in a dozen languages. | The book aims to increase public awareness of crimes committed by European colonial rulers in Africa. It was refused by nine of the ten U.S. publishing houses to which an outline was submitted, but became an unexpected bestseller and won the prestigious ] for literary style. By 2005, some 400,000 copies were in print in a dozen languages. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 25: | ||
| The story chronicles the efforts of ] of ] to make the Congo into a colonial empire. With a complex scheme of political intrigue, corruption and propaganda, he wins the assistance of one of the best-known explorers of the time, ], as well as that of public opinion and of powerful states. Through the ] and other diplomatic efforts, he finally obtains international recognition for his colony. He then establishes a system of forced labour that keeps the people of the Congo basin in a condition of slavery. | The story chronicles the efforts of ] of ] to make the Congo into a colonial empire. With a complex scheme of political intrigue, corruption and propaganda, he wins the assistance of one of the best-known explorers of the time, ], as well as that of public opinion and of powerful states. Through the ] and other diplomatic efforts, he finally obtains international recognition for his colony. He then establishes a system of forced labour that keeps the people of the Congo basin in a condition of slavery. | ||
| The book places King Leopold among the great tyrants of history. The death toll in the Congo under his regime is hard to pin down, both because accurate records were not kept and because many of the existing records were deliberately destroyed by Leopold shortly before the government of Belgium took the Congo out of his hands. Although Wm. Roger Louis and Jean Stengers<ref |
The book places King Leopold among the great tyrants of history. The death toll in the Congo under his regime is hard to pin down, both because accurate records were not kept and because many of the existing records were deliberately destroyed by Leopold shortly before the government of Belgium took the Congo out of his hands. Although Wm. Roger Louis and Jean Stengers<ref name="Morel" /> characterize the earliest population and mortality estimates as "wild guesses", Hochschild cites many subsequent lines of inquiry that conclude that the early official estimates were essentially correct: roughly half the population of the Congo perished during the Free State period. Since the census taken by the Belgian government (after acquiring the Congo from Leopold) found some 10 million inhabitants, Hochshild concludes that roughly 10 million perished, though the precise number can never be known. | ||
| Hochschild profiles several people who helped make the world aware of the reality of the Congo Free State, including: | Hochschild profiles several people who helped make the world aware of the reality of the Congo Free State, including: | ||
| Line 51: | Line 40: | ||
| Hochschild cites the research of several historians, many of them Belgian. He refers especially to ], formerly a Belgian colonial civil servant and diplomat who spent twenty years trying to break Belgian silence about the massacres. The documentation was not easy to come by; the furnaces of the palace in Brussels are said to have spent more than a week burning incriminating papers before Leopold turned over his private Congo to the Belgian nation. For many years Belgian authorities prevented access to what remained of the archives, notably the accounts given by Congolese to the King's Commission. | Hochschild cites the research of several historians, many of them Belgian. He refers especially to ], formerly a Belgian colonial civil servant and diplomat who spent twenty years trying to break Belgian silence about the massacres. The documentation was not easy to come by; the furnaces of the palace in Brussels are said to have spent more than a week burning incriminating papers before Leopold turned over his private Congo to the Belgian nation. For many years Belgian authorities prevented access to what remained of the archives, notably the accounts given by Congolese to the King's Commission. | ||
| Although few Africa scholars outside of Belgium seriously question that large numbers died in Leopold’s Congo, the subject remains a touchy one in Belgium itself. The country’s ], founded by Leopold II, mounted a special exhibition in 2005 about the colonial Congo; in an article in the ], Hochschild accused the museum of distortion and evasion.<ref name=Hochschild-2005-10-26 |
Although few Africa scholars outside of Belgium seriously question that large numbers died in Leopold’s Congo, the subject remains a touchy one in Belgium itself. The country’s ], founded by Leopold II, mounted a special exhibition in 2005 about the colonial Congo; in an article in the ], Hochschild accused the museum of distortion and evasion.<ref name="Hochschild-2005-10-26" /> | ||
| Also in 2005, the American and British publishers of ''King Leopold’s Ghost'' reissued the book with a new by Hochschild in which he talks about the reactions to the book, the death toll, and events in the Congo since its publication. | Also in 2005, the American and British publishers of ''King Leopold’s Ghost'' reissued the book with a new by Hochschild in which he talks about the reactions to the book, the death toll, and events in the Congo since its publication. | ||
| Line 63: | Line 52: | ||
| The Belgian historian ], whose works appear in the sources of ''King Leopold's Ghost'', claimed in a newspaper article that Hochschild's moral judgements are "not justified in respect at the time and place" and that his conclusions about the scale of the mass murder are based on incomplete statistics. He advanced the suspicion that in Hochschild's book historical objectivity was affected by the desire to attract the attention of the public – especially the African-American public. | The Belgian historian ], whose works appear in the sources of ''King Leopold's Ghost'', claimed in a newspaper article that Hochschild's moral judgements are "not justified in respect at the time and place" and that his conclusions about the scale of the mass murder are based on incomplete statistics. He advanced the suspicion that in Hochschild's book historical objectivity was affected by the desire to attract the attention of the public – especially the African-American public. | ||
| Hochschild was also criticized by ], author of a biography of Léopold, who described Hochschild's book as "a very shoddy piece of work" and declared that "Leopold did not start genocide. He was greedy for money and chose not to interest himself when things got out of control."<ref |
Hochschild was also criticized by ], author of a biography of Léopold, who described Hochschild's book as "a very shoddy piece of work" and declared that "Leopold did not start genocide. He was greedy for money and chose not to interest himself when things got out of control."<ref name="guardian" /> Hochschild has never called what happened in the Congo a genocide; he describes how these mass deaths happened as a result of a forced labor system.<ref name="Hochschild-2005-10-26"/> | ||
| Hochschild replied to Stengers, accusing him of not accepting the implications of his own research, arguing that while Stengers was "a meticulous and talented scholar", he was biased by his colonialist views. Hochschild points out that the estimates about the reduction of the population of the Congo reported in his book are taken in part from Stengers' writing. | Hochschild replied to Stengers, accusing him of not accepting the implications of his own research, arguing that while Stengers was "a meticulous and talented scholar", he was biased by his colonialist views. Hochschild points out that the estimates about the reduction of the population of the Congo reported in his book are taken in part from Stengers' writing. | ||
| Line 69: | Line 58: | ||
| Jules Marchal called Hochschild's book "a masterpiece, without even one error about the historical deeds related." He reminded people that Hochschild's conclusions were backed by his work on original sources. Several other Belgian experts on the period, such as anthropologist ], have also backed Hochschild. ], a Congolese scholar whose ''Histoire générale du Congo'' was published the same year as ''King Leopold's Ghost'', estimated the death toll in the Free State era and its aftermath at roughly 13 million, a higher figure than the various scholarly estimates Hochschild cites. | Jules Marchal called Hochschild's book "a masterpiece, without even one error about the historical deeds related." He reminded people that Hochschild's conclusions were backed by his work on original sources. Several other Belgian experts on the period, such as anthropologist ], have also backed Hochschild. ], a Congolese scholar whose ''Histoire générale du Congo'' was published the same year as ''King Leopold's Ghost'', estimated the death toll in the Free State era and its aftermath at roughly 13 million, a higher figure than the various scholarly estimates Hochschild cites. | ||
| '']'' reported in July 2002 that after initial outrage by Belgian historians over ''King Leopold's Ghost'', the state-funded ] would finance an investigation into Hochschild's allegations. The investigatory panel, likely to be headed by Professor ], was scheduled to report its findings in 2004.<ref name="Osborn_2002" |
'']'' reported in July 2002 that after initial outrage by Belgian historians over ''King Leopold's Ghost'', the state-funded ] would finance an investigation into Hochschild's allegations. The investigatory panel, likely to be headed by Professor ], was scheduled to report its findings in 2004.<ref name="Osborn_2002" /> The main result appears to be the museum exhibit mentioned above. | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
| Line 75: | Line 64: | ||
| {{reflist | {{reflist | ||
| | refs = | | refs = | ||
| <ref name="Morel"> | |||
| Wm. Roger Louis and Jean Stengers: ''E.D. Morel's History of the Congo Reform Movement'' p. 252-7. | |||
| </ref> | |||
| <ref name="Hochschild-2005-10-26"> | |||
| Adam Hochschild , ], 26 October 2005. "The exhibit deals with this question in a wall panel misleadingly headed 'Genocide in the Congo?' This is a red herring, for no reputable historian of the Congo has made charges of genocide; a forced labor system, although it may be equally deadly, is different." | |||
| </ref> | |||
| <ref name="guardian"> | |||
| , '']'', 13 May 1999 | |||
| </ref> | |||
| <ref name="Osborn_2002"> | |||
| Andrew Osborn '' ]'' July 13, 2002 | |||
| </ref> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| ; Cited works | |||
| * {{cite book | |||
| ⚫ | | last = Hochschild | ||
| ⚫ | | first = Adam | ||
| ⚫ | | authorlink = Adam Hochschild | ||
| ⚫ | | year = 1998 | ||
| | title = King Leopold's Ghost : a story of greed, terror, and heroism in colonial Africa | |||
| ⚫ | | publisher = ] | ||
| ⚫ | | series = | ||
| ⚫ | | doi = | ||
| ⚫ | | isbn = ISBN 0-330-49233-0 | ||
| ⚫ | <!-- (Published in the USA by Mariner Books, 1998, ISBN 0-618-00190-5.) --> | ||
| | ref = harv | |||
| }} | |||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 07:59, 2 June 2011
.jpg) | |
| Author | Adam Hochschild |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Mariner Books |
| Publication date | 1999 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (Hardback & Paperback) |
King Leopold's Ghost (1998) is a best-selling popular history book by Adam Hochschild that explores the exploitation of the Congo Free State by King Leopold II of Belgium between 1885 and 1908.
The book aims to increase public awareness of crimes committed by European colonial rulers in Africa. It was refused by nine of the ten U.S. publishing houses to which an outline was submitted, but became an unexpected bestseller and won the prestigious Mark Lynton History Prize for literary style. By 2005, some 400,000 copies were in print in a dozen languages.
The title is adopted from the poem The Congo, by Illinois poet Vachel Lindsay. Condemning Leopold's actions, Lindsay wrote: Listen to the yell of Leopold's ghost, / Burning in Hell for his hand-maimed host.
The book is the basis of a 2006 documentary film of the same name, directed by Pippa Scott and narrated by Don Cheadle.
The story of Leopold's Congo
The story chronicles the efforts of King Leopold II of Belgium to make the Congo into a colonial empire. With a complex scheme of political intrigue, corruption and propaganda, he wins the assistance of one of the best-known explorers of the time, Henry Morton Stanley, as well as that of public opinion and of powerful states. Through the Berlin Conference and other diplomatic efforts, he finally obtains international recognition for his colony. He then establishes a system of forced labour that keeps the people of the Congo basin in a condition of slavery.
The book places King Leopold among the great tyrants of history. The death toll in the Congo under his regime is hard to pin down, both because accurate records were not kept and because many of the existing records were deliberately destroyed by Leopold shortly before the government of Belgium took the Congo out of his hands. Although Wm. Roger Louis and Jean Stengers characterize the earliest population and mortality estimates as "wild guesses", Hochschild cites many subsequent lines of inquiry that conclude that the early official estimates were essentially correct: roughly half the population of the Congo perished during the Free State period. Since the census taken by the Belgian government (after acquiring the Congo from Leopold) found some 10 million inhabitants, Hochshild concludes that roughly 10 million perished, though the precise number can never be known.
Hochschild profiles several people who helped make the world aware of the reality of the Congo Free State, including:
- George Washington Williams, an African American politician and historian, the first to report the atrocities in the Congo to the outside world.
- William Henry Sheppard, another African American, a Presbyterian missionary who furnished direct testimony of the atrocities.
- E. D. Morel, a British journalist and shipping agent checking the commercial documents of the Congo Free State, who realized that the vast quantities of rubber and ivory coming out of the Congo were matched only by rifles and chains going in. From this he inferred that the Congo was a slave state, and he devoted the rest of his life to correcting that.
- Sir Roger Casement, a British diplomat and Irish patriot, put the force of the British government behind the international protest against Leopold. Casement's involvement had the ironic effect of drawing attention away from British colonialism, Hochschild suggests. The Congo Reform Association was formed by Morel at Casement's instigation.
Hochschild devotes a chapter to Joseph Conrad, the famous Anglo-Polish writer, who captained a steamer on the Congo River in the first years of Belgian colonization. Hochschild observes that Conrad's novel Heart of Darkness, despite its unspecific setting, gives a realistic picture of the Congo Free State. Its main character, Kurtz, was inspired by real state functionaries in the Congo, notably Leon Rom. While Heart of Darkness is probably the most reprinted and studied short novel of the 20th century, its psychological and moral truths have largely overshadowed the literal truth behind the story. Hochschild finds four likely models for Kurtz: men who, like Kurtz, boasted of cutting off the heads of African rebels and sometimes displayed them.
Documentation and bibliography
Hochschild cites the research of several historians, many of them Belgian. He refers especially to Jules Marchal, formerly a Belgian colonial civil servant and diplomat who spent twenty years trying to break Belgian silence about the massacres. The documentation was not easy to come by; the furnaces of the palace in Brussels are said to have spent more than a week burning incriminating papers before Leopold turned over his private Congo to the Belgian nation. For many years Belgian authorities prevented access to what remained of the archives, notably the accounts given by Congolese to the King's Commission.
Although few Africa scholars outside of Belgium seriously question that large numbers died in Leopold’s Congo, the subject remains a touchy one in Belgium itself. The country’s Royal Museum for Central Africa, founded by Leopold II, mounted a special exhibition in 2005 about the colonial Congo; in an article in the New York Review of Books, Hochschild accused the museum of distortion and evasion.
Also in 2005, the American and British publishers of King Leopold’s Ghost reissued the book with a new “Afterword” by Hochschild in which he talks about the reactions to the book, the death toll, and events in the Congo since its publication.
Reviews and critics
Hochschild has been praised by critics for his skill in telling the story. While acknowledging that most of the facts illustrated in the book were already known (although appearing in books and documents not easy to find), most historians and Africa specialists appreciated his capacity to narrate the history accurately. Hochschild's book was praised by scholars of Africa such as Prof. Robert Harms of Yale University and by the South African Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer.
Hochschild has said that his intention was to tell the story in "a way that brings characters alive, that brings out the moral dimension, that lays bare a great crime and a great crusade." His choice was the basis of his success, but some Belgian critics deplored his comparison of Leopold with Hitler and Stalin.
The Belgian historian Jean Stengers, whose works appear in the sources of King Leopold's Ghost, claimed in a newspaper article that Hochschild's moral judgements are "not justified in respect at the time and place" and that his conclusions about the scale of the mass murder are based on incomplete statistics. He advanced the suspicion that in Hochschild's book historical objectivity was affected by the desire to attract the attention of the public – especially the African-American public.
Hochschild was also criticized by Barbara Emerson, author of a biography of Léopold, who described Hochschild's book as "a very shoddy piece of work" and declared that "Leopold did not start genocide. He was greedy for money and chose not to interest himself when things got out of control." Hochschild has never called what happened in the Congo a genocide; he describes how these mass deaths happened as a result of a forced labor system.
Hochschild replied to Stengers, accusing him of not accepting the implications of his own research, arguing that while Stengers was "a meticulous and talented scholar", he was biased by his colonialist views. Hochschild points out that the estimates about the reduction of the population of the Congo reported in his book are taken in part from Stengers' writing.
Jules Marchal called Hochschild's book "a masterpiece, without even one error about the historical deeds related." He reminded people that Hochschild's conclusions were backed by his work on original sources. Several other Belgian experts on the period, such as anthropologist Jan Vansina, have also backed Hochschild. Isidore Ndaywel è Nziem, a Congolese scholar whose Histoire générale du Congo was published the same year as King Leopold's Ghost, estimated the death toll in the Free State era and its aftermath at roughly 13 million, a higher figure than the various scholarly estimates Hochschild cites.
The Guardian reported in July 2002 that after initial outrage by Belgian historians over King Leopold's Ghost, the state-funded Royal Museum for Central Africa would finance an investigation into Hochschild's allegations. The investigatory panel, likely to be headed by Professor Jean-Luc Vellut, was scheduled to report its findings in 2004. The main result appears to be the museum exhibit mentioned above.
References
- Hochschild 1998.
- Wm. Roger Louis and Jean Stengers: E.D. Morel's History of the Congo Reform Movement p. 252-7.
- ^ Adam Hochschild In the Heart of Darkness, New York Review of Books, 26 October 2005. "The exhibit deals with this question in a wall panel misleadingly headed 'Genocide in the Congo?' This is a red herring, for no reputable historian of the Congo has made charges of genocide; a forced labor system, although it may be equally deadly, is different."
- The hidden holocaust, The Guardian, 13 May 1999
- Andrew Osborn Belgium exhumes its colonial demons The Guardian July 13, 2002
- Cited works
- Hochschild, Adam (1998). King Leopold's Ghost : a story of greed, terror, and heroism in colonial Africa. Pan Macmillan. ISBN ISBN 0-330-49233-0.
{{cite book}}: Check|isbn=value: invalid character (help); Invalid|ref=harv(help)
External links
- Hochschild discusses King Leopold's Ghost at the Miami International Book Fair, starting 4 minutes into this video
- CoBelCo.org French language site on Belgian Congo made with the consultation of Adam Hochschild and Jules Marchal.
- Review from the New York Times
- Interview with Adam Hochschild on AlterNet about King Leopold's Ghost
- Review from the San Francisco Chronicle
- Review from Africa Studies Quarterly