| Revision as of 22:54, 6 March 2006 editEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)9,098 edits →[]: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:36, 11 March 2006 edit undoPablo-flores (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,694 edits →[]: deleted, closingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete''' ridiculous made-up neologism. --] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| *'''Delete'''. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--] 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--] 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above. -- ] 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | |||
Revision as of 14:36, 11 March 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete ridiculous made-up neologism. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Endopanerium
- Delete. neologism without any evidence of widespread use. Prod removed without reason--Porturology 06:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable, unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Is it sad that I've got that whole phrase memorized? -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete invented neologism joshbuddy 06:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete protologism, A proposed name Fan1967 06:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism. -- Samir ∙ C
07:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong 11:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. -- Alpha269 15:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.