Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bearian: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:25, 14 June 2011 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 13 June 2011: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:42, 14 June 2011 edit undoCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits →Collaboration on US Supreme Court case article improvement ?: new sectionNext edit →
Line 103: Line 103:
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' &middot; ] &middot; ] &middot; ] (]) 00:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)</div> <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' &middot; ] &middot; ] &middot; ] (]) 00:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0151 --> <!-- EdwardsBot 0151 -->

== Collaboration on US Supreme Court case article improvement ? ==

Hi Bearian, I have greatly admired your contributions in the area of ] on Misplaced Pages. :)

*I recently decided () to shift my focus away from other topics and away from DYK &mdash; and focus on quality improvement of articles on ]. Would you care to collaborate with me on a quality improvement drive &mdash; and perhaps start with '']'' ?

Thank you for your time, -- ''']''' (]) 15:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:42, 14 June 2011

IMPORTANT: If you have come here to ask me a legal question, please read Misplaced Pages's Legal Disclaimer first. No comment by me, on this page or anywhere else on this website, should be considered official legal advice; nor shall any communication between myself and any other person on this website constitute, or be held to create, a contractual or fiduciary relationship of any kind.
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please be nice when discussing here.

Archives

  • Archived discussions

For older discussions on this User's talk page, see

  1. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarchToJune2007,
  2. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJulyToMidAugust2007,
  3. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateAugust2007,
  4. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEarlySept2007,
  5. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateSept2007,
  6. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEarlyOct2007,
  7. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesLateOct2007,
  8. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesNov2007,
  9. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2007,
  10. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2008,
  11. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesEndJanFeb2008,
  12. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarch2008,
  13. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprilMay2008,
  14. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJune2008,
  15. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJuly2008,
  16. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAugSept2008,
  17. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOct2008,
  18. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesNov2008,
  19. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2008,
  20. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2009,
  21. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFebMar2009,
  22. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesApr2009,
  23. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMayJune2009,
  24. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJulyAug2009,
  25. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesSept2009,
  26. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctNovDec2009,
  27. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2010,
  28. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFeb2010,
  29. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMar2010,
  30. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprMay2010,
  31. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJuneJuly2010,
  32. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAugSept2010,
  33. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesOctNov2010,
  34. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesDec2010,
  35. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJan2011,
  36. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesFeb2011,
  37. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMarApr2011,and
  38. User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMay2011.

New stuff

not a test

what's wrong with those edits? they removed all the "original research" from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RFI2013 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

oh i just saw you're the one who put in all that info! ("original research") sorry! but still i think u should leave it to neutrals to assess your reasearch/content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RFI2013 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

My RfA

I just wanted to take a minute to thank you very much for supporting me in my recent RfA. Even though it was unsuccessful, I appreciate your trust. With much gratitude, jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. Try in another 3 months' time. Bearian (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

...for the barnstar It was a most rewarding effort. Schmidt, 16:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Compulsive hoarding

The section that I deleted may be well-cited, but it has nothing to do with compulsive hoarding and was added very recently. I have broached the subject of its deletion on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JLA87 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Prop. deletion

(1) One talk page section will suffice; three are rather unnecessary.
(2) If you disagree with the proposed deletion; then go ahead and remove it; that's the way the system works. I am very familiar with relevant policies; statements like "do some basic research" add little value. Let me stress that all of these are judgment calls; I tagged something like 80 articles, and if other editors think that eight of those are worth a full Articles for Deletion discussion, I consider that a good batting average. Again, that's the way the system works.
(3) Re notification: If you read the policy, you'll see that notifying article creators is "ideal"; it is not required. Further, it is explicitly not necessary in "cases where contributors are no longer regarded as active editors on Misplaced Pages." You will find that the vast majority of the articles tagged during my round of proposed deletions were created by inactive editors (these articles were from two years old or older in most cases). Neutrality 03:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I see you have a very good percentage of being correct, but we all miss some things sometimes. Bearian (talk)

The Bronx Company

HI Bearian. Thanks for stopping by my talkpage. I did a quick search and didn't find anything I could add from a reliable resource. I'll look again before the weekend. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Voting

Candidates are here. Bearian (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Collaboration on US Supreme Court case article improvement ?

Hi Bearian, I have greatly admired your contributions in the area of WP:LAW on Misplaced Pages. :)

  • I recently decided (diff) to shift my focus away from other topics and away from DYK — and focus on quality improvement of articles on U.S. Supreme Court cases. Would you care to collaborate with me on a quality improvement drive — and perhaps start with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ?

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)