Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:57, 14 June 2011

Marknutley

Marknutley (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Please note that a case was originally opened under DarknessShines2 (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marknutley. Future cases should be placed under Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marknutley.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

14 June 2011

Suspected sockpuppets

• The Last Angry Man (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Marknutley was blocked for block evasion 28 Oct 2010. He continued editing using dynamic IPs and OPs, and created a sock account, User:Tentontunic. A dynamic IP began edit-warring on Communist Terrorism, which was then protected, and the IP set up the account The Last Angry Man (TLAM). I believe that TLAM is a sock of mark nutley for the following reasons:

• Removal of POV tags
  • 28 May 2011 TLAM on Communist terrorism
  • 8 March 2011 Tentontunic on Mass killings under Communist regimes

• Similarity of writing style
  • User:94.12.52.247: "anyone here thinking i am a sock would be wrong, i read the article and see fuckall pov about it. This blocking of an article from unregistered users is just another commie joke."
  • User:216.169.108.198: "you ask for protection after putting back your version? typical commie"
  • User:88.108.218.93: "Yes i did mate, because yourself and siebert were being dicks, you got a guy blocked for following policy when the two of you edit warred unsourced content into an article. Have a nice day :) Mark."

• Creation of stub articles on controversial topics
  • TLAM 31 May 2011: Communist crimes against humanity
  • Tentontunic created "Father Stalin look at this".

• Another editor stated his suspicions
  • "The absence of capital letters, the language (especially "commie"), rudeness, anti-Communism and the British origin this IP indicates that the edits have been made by Marknutley/Tentontunic."

• TLAM and Tentontunic both use TW.

• Both TLAM and Tentontunic revert User:Igny to remove POV tag from Occupation of the Baltic states.,

• Both TLAM and Tentontunic express concern about showing neutrality in articles about the British far right: Tentontunic & British National Party, TLAM and English Defence League

• TLAM and Tentontunic both edited Malayan Emergency.

• TLAM deletes the article Terror. Earlier, Tentontunic had nominated the article for deletion.

Could editors commenting on this case kindly post under "Comments by other users" below. TFD (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've had a few run-ins with TLAM on the talk page of the article on the EDL; looking through the archives of user talk:marknutley, it strikes me that both TLAM and mn appear to frequently conflate the difference between fact, interpretation, and analysis on the one hand, and opinion on the other. Furthermore, allegations that an article is not neutral seem to be a preferred M.O. of both editors, accompanied by frustration on the part of other editors that mn/TLAM has a rather unique view of neutrality. That's my two cents, anyway. Sindinero (talk) 15:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

(Although, granted, as an afterthought, the epistemological confusion I've mentioned above is hardly damning evidence, as it's pretty widespread.) Sindinero (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

This is bullshit, I have already been investigated and cleared, how many times do I have to be accussed of being a sockpuppet? The evidence is bull, the accusations are bull, and it appears to me that TFD does this to drive new editors away. The Last Angry Man (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I am bemused by TLAM's comments belowabove. Suspicions about that account have only once previously been brought to SPI, and TLAM was not notified and appears to have had no involvement with SPI whatsoever. TFD (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I am even more bemused that you think it impossible that people can`t follow a few links to see what is being said about them, Once people accused me of cheating I did of course look at their contributions to see what was being said of me. The Last Angry Man (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

I find it interesting that you state you have "already been investigated and cleared", yet this is the first time this account has been posted on SPI. Interesting, indeed... --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Are you blind? Look at the link posted in my last post, this is the second time i have been accused of being a sockpuppet of mark nutley. The Last Angry Man (talk) 22:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Open SPI cases
• SPI cases for pre-CheckUser review
• SPI cases requesting a checkuser