| Revision as of 06:24, 12 March 2006 editCambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators253,177 edits Removing comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:43, 12 March 2006 edit undo82.15.17.152 (talk) Get off my back, you lunatic. If no one is complaining why would you care?Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I've hopefully cleaned up the mess and fixed up all the articles. The ] article can be filled out with more information from Mahendra Baba and Baba Hari Dasa that shouldn't clutter up the ] article. All three articles do or should mention the confusingly similarly named ] so no one tries to merge the articles. —] 01:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | I've hopefully cleaned up the mess and fixed up all the articles. The ] article can be filled out with more information from Mahendra Baba and Baba Hari Dasa that shouldn't clutter up the ] article. All three articles do or should mention the confusingly similarly named ] so no one tries to merge the articles. —] 01:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Removing comments== | |||
| Do not remove comments from other peoples talk pages as it's vandalism. ] ] 06:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:43, 12 March 2006
Yet another Babaji or too many Babajis!
Gotcha. I'll add another line to Babaji and remove the confusion from the Haidakhan Babaji page and blank the redirects if you will follow up by (re) creating the Hariakhan Baba page. Unfortunately, there appear to be quite a few webpages out there also confused on the issue, and I must have stumbled upon them... -Adityanath 00:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
I've hopefully cleaned up the mess and fixed up all the articles. The Hariakhan Baba article can be filled out with more information from Mahendra Baba and Baba Hari Dasa that shouldn't clutter up the Mahavatar Babaji article. All three articles do or should mention the confusingly similarly named Haidakhan Babaji so no one tries to merge the articles. —Adityanath 01:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)