Revision as of 15:51, 20 June 2011 editAhunt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers229,416 edits →Cycle Hire scheme: reply← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:31, 20 June 2011 edit undoΔ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,263 edits remove non-free content per WP:NFCC#9Next edit → |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
:Sure I can make you one up - what should it say? We could do a generic style one or something more specific. - ] (]) 12:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Sure I can make you one up - what should it say? We could do a generic style one or something more specific. - ] (]) 12:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
How about "This user is a member of the cycle hire scheme" with the logo on the left? The London one (without "Barclays") is in the middle of ] whilst the ] one is in that article too. But there's so many now, perhaps a generic one would be better? ] (]) 15:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
How about "This user is a member of the cycle hire scheme" with the logo on the left? The London one (without "Barclays") is in the middle of whilst the ] one is in that article too. But there's so many now, perhaps a generic one would be better? ] (]) 15:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The only complication with logos is that they are copyrighted and so can't be used in user boxes as per ]. Any other preferences for an image? - ] (]) 15:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
|
:The only complication with logos is that they are copyrighted and so can't be used in user boxes as per ]. Any other preferences for an image? - ] (]) 15:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
How about "This user is a member of the cycle hire scheme" with the logo on the left? The London one (without "Barclays") is in the middle of whilst the Velib one is in that article too. But there's so many now, perhaps a generic one would be better? Davoloid (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2011 (UTC)