Transnistria conflict: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:32, 12 March 2006 editAltenmann (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers217,257 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:24, 13 March 2006 edit undo206.49.165.171 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The '''disputed status of ]''' exists because of a ] claim by ], which is rejected by Transnistria.		The '''disputed status of ]''' exists because of a ] claim by ], which is rejected by Transnistria.

	Moldova lost control of Transnistria in the ] ], but never formally ceded the territory. Moreover, Transnistria has not been ] (except by other ]) and is considered a part of Moldova.		Moldova lost control of Transnistria in the ] breakup of the ] and the subsequent ], but never formally ceded the territory. Moreover, Transnistria has not been ] (except by other ]) and is considered a part of Moldova.

	Transnistria's two main political groups, ] (''Respublica'') and ] (''Obnovleniye'') are opposed to any transfer of sovereignty to Moldova, and no major political party or pressure group in Transnistria supports union with Moldova. However, negotiations under ] auspices have been ongoing since ] based on the premise that better relations are desirable, and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.		Transnistria's two main political groups, ] (''Respublica'') and ] (''Obnovleniye'') are opposed to any transfer of sovereignty to Moldova, and no major political party or pressure group in Transnistria supports union with Moldova. However, negotiations under ] auspices have been ongoing since ] based on the premise that better relations are desirable, and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Position of the Transnistrian side==		==Position of the Transnistrian side==

	The territory to the East of the ] never belonged neither to ], not its predecessors, suc as ]. This territory was split off ] in a political maneuver of the ] to become a seed of the ]. (A similar example of a Soviet expansionist maneuver was ]). ~~Transnistriua~~ ceded itself from ] before the ]. Since Moldova declared independence of the Soviet Union, all political arrangements made within the Soviet Union must be considered void.		The territory to the East of the ] never belonged neither to ], not its predecessors, suc as ]. This territory was split off ] in a political maneuver of the ] to become a seed of the ]. (A similar example of a Soviet expansionist maneuver was ]). Transnistria ceded itself from ] before the ]. Since Moldova declared independence of the Soviet Union, all political arrangements made within the Soviet Union must be considered void.

	==External links==		==External links==

Revision as of 04:24, 13 March 2006

Politics of Transnistria


Constitution
Executive President Vadim Krasnoselsky Prime Minister Aleksandr Martynov
LegislatureSupreme Council Speaker Alexander Korshunov Political parties
Elections Recent elections Presidential: 2016 2021 Parliamentary: 2015 2020 Referendums
Administrative divisions Five Raions One Municipality
Foreign relations Ministry of Foreign Affairs Minister: Vitaly Ignatyev Human rights in Transnistria Politics of Moldova Transnistria conflict Transnistria War Proposed Russian annexation of Transnistria Passport Visa requirements Visa policy Diplomatic missions of / in Transnistria
Other countries
v t e

The disputed status of Transnistria exists because of a 1991 claim by Moldova, which is rejected by Transnistria.

Moldova lost control of Transnistria in the 1990 breakup of the Moldovan SSR and the subsequent War of Transnistria, but never formally ceded the territory. Moreover, Transnistria has not been internationally recognised (except by other unrecognised states) and is considered a part of Moldova.

Transnistria's two main political groups, Republic (Respublica) and Renewal (Obnovleniye) are opposed to any transfer of sovereignty to Moldova, and no major political party or pressure group in Transnistria supports union with Moldova. However, negotiations under OSCE auspices have been ongoing since 1997 based on the premise that better relations are desirable, and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.

Position of the Transnistrian side

The territory to the East of the Dniester River never belonged neither to Romania, not its predecessors, suc as Principality of Moldavia. This territory was split off Ukrainian SSR in a political maneuver of the USSR to become a seed of the Moldovan SSR. (A similar example of a Soviet expansionist maneuver was Finnish Democratic Republic). Transnistria ceded itself from Moldovan SSR before the Dissolution of the Soviet Union. Since Moldova declared independence of the Soviet Union, all political arrangements made within the Soviet Union must be considered void.