Misplaced Pages

User talk:GiacomoReturned: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:29, 27 June 2011 editGiacomoReturned (talk | contribs)Rollbackers11,926 edits →Your query← Previous edit Revision as of 19:16, 27 June 2011 edit undoRexxS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,075 edits →Your query: a certain frisson of excitementNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
Since another gazillion socks were publicly revealed as recently as March, which has nothing to do with whether she continues socking. ] (]) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Since another gazillion socks were publicly revealed as recently as March, which has nothing to do with whether she continues socking. ] (]) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
:::'''Could not?''' since when, Sandy, does ''could not'' mean anything on Misplaced Pages? I recall, my Arbcom candidature was sabotaged by Mr Wales and his court because if I did not disclose my name, address, granny's maiden name and puppy's birthday the security of the arbcom mailing list ''could not'' be assured, but yet again I have been proven right. People like Matisse (and that other long gone female whose name escapes me should beware I have a very long memory and Iridescent should remember that too and she should also remember that "the Bishonen and Giano clique" for whom she clearly has so little regard have better things to do with their time than hunt down worthy editors like Malleus or anyone else for that matter - what an extraordinary thing to have said. The Arbcom seems to be lacking what is commonly known as "professionalism" these days. It is to be regretted. ] ] 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC) :::'''Could not?''' since when, Sandy, does ''could not'' mean anything on Misplaced Pages? I recall, my Arbcom candidature was sabotaged by Mr Wales and his court because if I did not disclose my name, address, granny's maiden name and puppy's birthday the security of the arbcom mailing list ''could not'' be assured, but yet again I have been proven right. People like Matisse (and that other long gone female whose name escapes me should beware I have a very long memory and Iridescent should remember that too and she should also remember that "the Bishonen and Giano clique" for whom she clearly has so little regard have better things to do with their time than hunt down worthy editors like Malleus or anyone else for that matter - what an extraordinary thing to have said. The Arbcom seems to be lacking what is commonly known as "professionalism" these days. It is to be regretted. ] ] 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
:: One might be tempted to assume, Excellency, that spending much of one's time examining the behaviour of editors at the last stage of our unsavoury dispute procedure might lead at best to a very jaundiced view of our worthy project, at worst to mental distress. It is therefore probably excusable for Iridescent to coin such an unexpected phrase. I must admit, though, that it has a certain ring to it: "Bishonen and Giano clique". How would one apply for membership, I wonder? In all my 65,000,0059 years, I've never been part of a "clique" but the "B & G Clique" has such a cachet to it, that I'm sorely tempted to enquire. Yours hopefully, --] (]) 19:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 27 June 2011

Old messages are at:



Please leave new messages below

Irish Country Houses

Hi, I don't know if you're still interested in this topic, but I've written up my own article on it here. http://www.theirishstory.com/2011/06/21/the-big-house-and-the-irish-revolution/

Jdorney (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I am still intereted, but real life is claimimg more of my time than Misplaced Pages. I have a page in progress here User:GiacomoReturned/'Political history of the Irish country house; if you want to put your page in article space, that is fine by me. If not, I will certainly use your excellent article as a reference in my page. I can't see my page realistically being finished until Christmas, when I will have the time to sit down and properly research and read up on the subject. Giacomo Returned 13:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome to use it as a reference. Best of luck with your own article!

Jdorney (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I think you were very wise to place your article within a limited time frame. That had been my original intention too, but I became sidetracked by all the interesting things that I found. I expect I will finish it sooner or later, I usually do. I still have your list of references kindly emailed, so they will be much used. Giacomo Returned 18:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Really good article, Giano. Thank you. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Your query

Since another gazillion socks were publicly revealed as recently as March, she could not have been permitted back yet, which has nothing to do with whether she continues socking. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Could not? since when, Sandy, does could not mean anything on Misplaced Pages? I recall, my Arbcom candidature was sabotaged by Mr Wales and his court because if I did not disclose my name, address, granny's maiden name and puppy's birthday the security of the arbcom mailing list could not be assured, but yet again I have been proven right. People like Matisse (and that other long gone female whose name escapes me should beware I have a very long memory and Iridescent should remember that too and she should also remember that "the Bishonen and Giano clique" for whom she clearly has so little regard have better things to do with their time than hunt down worthy editors like Malleus or anyone else for that matter - what an extraordinary thing to have said. The Arbcom seems to be lacking what is commonly known as "professionalism" these days. It is to be regretted. Giacomo Returned 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
One might be tempted to assume, Excellency, that spending much of one's time examining the behaviour of editors at the last stage of our unsavoury dispute procedure might lead at best to a very jaundiced view of our worthy project, at worst to mental distress. It is therefore probably excusable for Iridescent to coin such an unexpected phrase. I must admit, though, that it has a certain ring to it: "Bishonen and Giano clique". How would one apply for membership, I wonder? In all my 65,000,0059 years, I've never been part of a "clique" but the "B & G Clique" has such a cachet to it, that I'm sorely tempted to enquire. Yours hopefully, --RexxS (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)