| Revision as of 17:29, 27 June 2011 editBearian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers84,481 edits Alleged cavassing | Revision as of 19:36, 27 June 2011 edit undoKen Arromdee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,259 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Alleged cavassing== | ==Alleged cavassing== | ||
| I do not consider to be ], and in any case, it's had no immediate effect, . ] (]) 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | I do not consider to be ], and in any case, it's had no immediate effect, . ] (]) 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==Re: Outside view by Gamaliel== | |||
| I agree that it looks like some of the charges are just throwing everything at him to see if something sticks. But there are also some legitimate charges in there as well. This RFC seems to be treating Cirt like OJ Simpson--like the police then, we're trying to frame someone who's guilty anyway. It's bad for the police to use bogus evidence, but ultimately, OJ did do the deed he was accused of. ] (]) 19:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:36, 27 June 2011
Alleged cavassing
I do not consider this to be canvassing, and in any case, it's had no immediate effect, as I responded to put off the work. Bearian (talk) 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Re: Outside view by Gamaliel
I agree that it looks like some of the charges are just throwing everything at him to see if something sticks. But there are also some legitimate charges in there as well. This RFC seems to be treating Cirt like OJ Simpson--like the police then, we're trying to frame someone who's guilty anyway. It's bad for the police to use bogus evidence, but ultimately, OJ did do the deed he was accused of. Ken Arromdee (talk) 19:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)