Misplaced Pages

talk:Use common sense: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:25, 2 March 2006 editZocky (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,115 edits There's no common sense← Previous edit Revision as of 02:18, 14 March 2006 edit undoWikiLeon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors15,155 edits About this pageNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:I think the ] shows that the idea behind this policy is flawed.] 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC) :I think the ] shows that the idea behind this policy is flawed.] 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
::Agreed. There's no common sense. ] | ] 12:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC) ::Agreed. There's no common sense. ] | ] 12:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

::It isn't supposed to be policy at all. --]]]] 02:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:18, 14 March 2006

About this page

This page was created as a fork of Ignore all rules. Some felt there wasn't enough detail in "IAR" as it as called and others wanted to maintain its brief original form. This fork was created to expand more on the concepts of IAR. For a complete history, see the IAR talk page. --Wgfinley 05:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I think the Monty Hall problem shows that the idea behind this policy is flawed.Geni 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. There's no common sense. Zocky | picture popups 12:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
It isn't supposed to be policy at all. --LBMixPro 02:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)