Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Gatekeeper (politics): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:03, 13 March 2006 editNorthmeister (talk | contribs)3,786 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 07:40, 14 March 2006 edit undoHerschelkrustofsky (talk | contribs)2,877 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


You may move any comments I've made to this page at your own pleasure. I can not speak for the others. Thanks. --] 21:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC) You may move any comments I've made to this page at your own pleasure. I can not speak for the others. Thanks. --] 21:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

==The outcome of this process==

It is more than a little dishonest to say that this article was speedily kept; when the article is stripped down to two sentences and renamed, it has been deleted for all intents and purposes. Ironically, this is certainly one instance in which Misplaced Pages may be seen as a gatekeeping organization. However, Misplaced Pages was in the process of gaining that reputation long before this particular controversy arose. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">]</font></font> 07:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:40, 14 March 2006

In the interests of maintaining clarity on the vote page, I'd like to request that the participants voluntarily move their debates, rants, flame wars and ad hominem attacks to this page. --HK 15:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

You may move any comments I've made to this page at your own pleasure. I can not speak for the others. Thanks. --Northmeister 21:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The outcome of this process

It is more than a little dishonest to say that this article was speedily kept; when the article is stripped down to two sentences and renamed, it has been deleted for all intents and purposes. Ironically, this is certainly one instance in which Misplaced Pages may be seen as a gatekeeping organization. However, Misplaced Pages was in the process of gaining that reputation long before this particular controversy arose. --HK 07:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)