| Revision as of 20:00, 14 February 2006 editJeandré du Toit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,684 editsm →External links: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:52, 14 March 2006 edit undoGreen01 (talk | contribs)399 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| '''''Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media''''' is a book by ] and ], first published in 1988. | '''''Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media''''' is a book by ] and ], first published in 1988. | ||
| Presenting |
Presenting an analysis its authors call the "]", the book argues that since ] news outlets are now run by large ]s, they are under the same competitive pressures as other corporations. According to the book, the pressure to create a stable, profitable business invariably distorts the kinds of news items reported, as well as the manner and emphasis in which they are reported. This occurs not as a result of conscious design but simply as a consequence of market selection: those businesses who happen to favor profits over news quality survive, while those that present a more accurate picture of the world tend to become marginalized. | ||
| The book further points out issues with the dependency of mass media news outlets upon major sources of news, particularly the ]. If a particular outlet is in disfavor with a government, it can be subtly 'shut out', and other outlets given preferential treatment. Since this results in a loss in news leadership, it can also result in a loss of readership/viewership. That can itself result in a loss of advertising revenue, which is the primary income for most mass media (newspapers, magazines, television). To minimize the possibilities of lost revenue, therefore, outlets will tend to report news in a tone more favorable to the government and giving unfavorable news about the government less emphasis. | The book further points out issues with the dependency of mass media news outlets upon major sources of news, particularly the ]. If a particular outlet is in disfavor with a government, it can be subtly 'shut out', and other outlets given preferential treatment. Since this results in a loss in news leadership, it can also result in a loss of readership/viewership. That can itself result in a loss of advertising revenue, which is the primary income for most mass media (newspapers, magazines, television). To minimize the possibilities of lost revenue, therefore, outlets will tend to report news in a tone more favorable to the government and giving unfavorable news about the government less emphasis. | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 14 March 2006
- This article is about the original book; for the film and companion book based on it, see Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media is a book by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, first published in 1988.
Presenting an analysis its authors call the "propaganda model", the book argues that since mass media news outlets are now run by large corporations, they are under the same competitive pressures as other corporations. According to the book, the pressure to create a stable, profitable business invariably distorts the kinds of news items reported, as well as the manner and emphasis in which they are reported. This occurs not as a result of conscious design but simply as a consequence of market selection: those businesses who happen to favor profits over news quality survive, while those that present a more accurate picture of the world tend to become marginalized.
The book further points out issues with the dependency of mass media news outlets upon major sources of news, particularly the government. If a particular outlet is in disfavor with a government, it can be subtly 'shut out', and other outlets given preferential treatment. Since this results in a loss in news leadership, it can also result in a loss of readership/viewership. That can itself result in a loss of advertising revenue, which is the primary income for most mass media (newspapers, magazines, television). To minimize the possibilities of lost revenue, therefore, outlets will tend to report news in a tone more favorable to the government and giving unfavorable news about the government less emphasis.
The title makes use of the catch phrase coined by Walter Lippman.
The documentary film Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, directed by Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick was based in part on Chomsky and Herman's work; the remainder of the film serves as a biography of Chomsky.