| Revision as of 15:59, 1 July 2004 editTuomas (talk | contribs)1,793 edits restoring concealed edit done by User:213.243.157.114 at Treaty of Hamina← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:18, 1 July 2004 edit undoTuomas (talk | contribs)1,793 edits language tweaks and restructuring paragraph on guarantees against RussificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''Treaty of Fredrikshamn''' on ], ], concluded the ] between ] and ]. The treaty was signed in the present-day ] town of ]. | The '''Treaty of Fredrikshamn''' on ], ], concluded the ] between ] and ]. The treaty was signed in the present-day ] town of ]. | ||
| According to the treaty Sweden ceded ], parts of the provinces ] and ] (east of the rivers of ] and ]) and all provinces east thereof. | According to the treaty Sweden ceded ], parts of the provinces ] and ] (east of the rivers of ] and ]) and all provinces east thereof. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Together with the ] (]) the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the ] Grand Duchy of Finland, and thereby the start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish language and culture, and ultimately in ] to Finland's independence. | Together with the ] (]) the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the ] Grand Duchy of Finland, and thereby the start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish language and culture, and ultimately in ] to Finland's independence. | ||
| A reference to ]'s promise to retain old laws and privileges in Finland was included, but the treaty overstepped any formal guarantees of the legal position of Finland's inhabitants. The Russians refused, and the Swedes were not in a position to insist. Similar clauses had been common in peace treaties, but they were also regularly circumvented. At the ], 90 years later, the Russian government argued that the treaty wasn't violated and hence no outside party had any right to intervene, the question being solely a matter between the ] and the Finns. | |||
| Also for Sweden, the treaty turned out to be ultimately beneficial. During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had endeavoured to escape the loss of the ] islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as ] rightly described them. (The Åland islands were additionally culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time.) In the course of the ] it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a ] interest, which after the ] led to the ] of the islands according to the ] included in the ]. | Also for Sweden, the treaty turned out to be ultimately beneficial. During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had endeavoured to escape the loss of the ] islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as ] rightly described them. (The Åland islands were additionally culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time.) In the course of the ] it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a ] interest, which after the ] led to the ] of the islands according to the ] included in the ]. | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 1 July 2004
The Treaty of Fredrikshamn on September 17, 1809, concluded the Finnish War between Imperial Russia and Sweden. The treaty was signed in the present-day Finnish town of Hamina.
According to the treaty Sweden ceded Åland, parts of the provinces Laponia and Westrobothnia (east of the rivers of Tornio and Muonio) and all provinces east thereof.
The ceded terrotories came to constitute a Russian Grand Duchy, to which also the 18th century conquests of Karelia including parts of Nylandia and Savonia were later annexed (see: "Old Finland").
Together with the Porvoo Diet (1809) the Treaty of Fredrikshamn constitutes the cornerstone for the autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland, and thereby the start of the development which would lead to the revival of Finnish language and culture, and ultimately in 1917 to Finland's independence.
A reference to Tsar Alexander's promise to retain old laws and privileges in Finland was included, but the treaty overstepped any formal guarantees of the legal position of Finland's inhabitants. The Russians refused, and the Swedes were not in a position to insist. Similar clauses had been common in peace treaties, but they were also regularly circumvented. At the Russification of Finland, 90 years later, the Russian government argued that the treaty wasn't violated and hence no outside party had any right to intervene, the question being solely a matter between the Tsar and the Finns.
Also for Sweden, the treaty turned out to be ultimately beneficial. During the negotiations, Swedish representatives had endeavoured to escape the loss of the Åland islands, "the fore-posts of Stockholm," as Napoleon rightly described them. (The Åland islands were additionally culturally, ethnically and linguistically purely Swedish, but such facts were of no significance at that time.) In the course of the 19th century it would also turn out that the Åland islands were a British interest, which after the Crimean War led to the de-militarization of the islands according to the Åland Convention included in the Treaty of Paris (1856).
Instead of the Åland islands, Sweden came to retain vast areas in the far North, already conquered by the Russians, where later important iron ore and hydropower were to constitute the basis for Sweden's rapid 20th century industrialization.
Categories: