Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:32, 15 March 2006

Are you Shitole's New Crony?

Hi, what you said in my Talk Page is not true. I have been participating with the discussions every single day without fail, and I never saw any general consensus approving your version. Actually, there is a voting going on and some people don't even want Mr. Shitole's name there. It is you who sin't participating with the voting. I have reverted your reversion on the grounds that no general consensus has been formed approving your version. Shitole's words weren't there before and the article was already fine. Nobody complained about it. It is you who should make a convincing case why Shitole's words should be there in the first place. So what if he claims to have met Babaji? What does the mention of Shitole's name and book actually add to the article? Actually, it only turns the article into an advertisement for Shitole.

No To Frauds 17:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Restoring userpage history

Thank you, i appreciate it :)--Striver 12:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

It seems we've started working cross purposes on the Ma Yueh-liang and Wu Ying-hua pages. At the very least, I'll stop working on them while you're editing. Jabberw0cky 14:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Redirect

If you google "David Race Bannon", you can see that he was recently arrested, partly based on evidence by Samuel Browning of Bullshido.net

There is a new David "Race" Bannon article that is not showing up in Misplaced Pages searches. Also, searching for "Race Bannon" turns up Johnny Quest. Can you set up a disambig page for "Race Bannon" searches, and see if you can make sure the article can be searchable?

Thanks!

--Scb steve 03:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I managed to figure it out. Disambig pages on the Johnny Quest page, and other pages are set up. Try doing a search for Race Bannon or David Bannon.

--Scb steve 22:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

User:212.219.63.204

We gave blocks of conflicting time to this college school IP. I gave 3 hours, you gave 1 week. I beleive that the shorter block will automatically take effect. Mostly letting you know so that, if you wish to restore your longer block, you can do so. Do keep in mind that long blocks on this IP have been removed in the past because of collateral damage to good users. - TexasAndroid 15:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• • Dear Firestar, sorry I can't figure out how to create a new topic here, so I edited this one by adding my query. I've got a couple of questions I hope you can help with. One is, when I did a "world tai chi & qigong day" search on wikipedia the World Tai Chi & Qigong Day article did not appear. How can I get it searchable on wiki? Second. I've uploaded a jpg to World Tai Chi & Qigong Day's url, but can't for the life of me, understand how that gets into the article. When I click on the add image, it has no offering of a way to actually get the jpg I uploaded into the editing text. (?) Thanks for any tips you can give. World Tai Chi & Qigong Day 17:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi, sorry for all that stuff. I was frustrated with PFHLai as he came off as condesending when he was questioning me about using the attribution tag. I was confused on how to tag this photo as a copyrighted image and didnt know about the image policies until later. My regards. Sai Tién! S0berage 23:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Mulitple biographic entries

Hi Does Misplaced Pages have an actual policy regrading multiple biographic entries? If you have a chance please take a look here. More curious than a deep need to become involved but I could not find anything in the help section. http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Steven_Seagal#Takeshigemichi and Chungdrag Dorje Peter Rehse 01:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Lets see how the responses go. I've quoted what you wrote (as anonymous administrator).Peter Rehse 02:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Use of the word "salnder" in the wikipedi article

I used the word slander becaue that is the word used in the lectures... it is NOT SAID ANYWHERE THAT "CRITICIZING" The Dharma would bring a lot of karma on the inividual.... the word used in the lectures is "SLANDER"... i think "slander" and "criticism" are different.... Btw, how do you send a message to another user? -Dilip Rajeev

Constant flaming

Hi Firestar,

There is yet another personal attack on my talk page, by the same person. Would like it removed if possible. I'm just wondering if this individual has ever written an constructive edit...article or talk page...

Also, please see latest discussion in Mahavatar Babaji talk page. I think we can agree to the main 2 sentences, and leave out the quotes. I haven't put my consent to that on the talk page, because I think that the flaming individual will just try to strike out even that. I have not found it possible to deal with that person rationally. So the format would be Sentence 1. Sentence 2. Sentence introducing quote. Quote. Will look for your comments on that discussion page. Thanks. Hamsacharya dan 21:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Yogiraj Gurunath

Thank you very much for mediating the Babaji discussion. I would like to turn our attention to the Kriya Yoga page, Nath page, and Yogiraj Gurunath page as well, as we had originally discussed. Some evidence that Gurunath is a Nath HERE. Also, if you do a google search for "Nath sampradaya", his page is #1. FireStar - I came across this page just now, and thought I should bring it to your attention, since those other editors were calling it into question. Most of them have never even heard of the Naths and yet they decided to chime in. Yogiraj Gurunath is clearly a Nath - and just because a few people on here haven't heard of him, doesn't mean his contributions are not significant. Anyway, I leave it up to you to mediate these changes, because any additions I make seem to attract attention from a couple of these individuals who damage my edits beyond repair. I'm not going to get involved in any more edit warring - don't have time for that.

Anyway, what I would like, if possible, since this clearly worked in the Babaji page, is for us to start a similar discussion in each of these sections in order that we can come to another concensus as far as additions. For example do you recall the issue about adding quotes in the babaji page?: the same quotes that we decided to leave off the Babaji page and put on the Yogiraj Gurunath page, were removed from the Gurunath page! I want to keep in line with Misplaced Pages guidelines, but I also don't want to be bullied on here. I would really appreciate your help. Hamsacharya dan 07:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Adityanath

As I have read on, on the weblink i sent you, I have noticed that this person Adityanath has been pushing his POV on other websites as well. Now it makes sense why he is guarding the Nath page. I'm really disturbed by the implications this has on wikipedia. When I tried making additions to the nath page, they were promptly deleted. All the more reason that your moderating would be greatly appreciated!! Sorry, I'm really not trying to put down others, but how are people supposed to add information to wikipedia if these articles are perpetually guarded by fanatical editors? Hamsacharya dan 07:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath

Thanks for letting me know about the move. ---Baba Louis 16:43, 15 March 2006 (UTC)