| Revision as of 22:03, 15 March 2006 editAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits created afd | Revision as of 22:03, 15 March 2006 edit undoBatmanand (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,783 edits keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Anti-notable. This AFD is being placed because the NYT is anti-notable, namely, that anyone mentioned in its pages, despite its preeminence, popularity, and market penetration, is instantly cast into non-notability. The precedent for this is ] and ] where the subject was deleted because he was in the New York Times on the front page and that made him non-notable. It is time that the NYT come off the pages of wikipedia like the blackhole of notability it is. -- ] 22:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | Anti-notable. This AFD is being placed because the NYT is anti-notable, namely, that anyone mentioned in its pages, despite its preeminence, popularity, and market penetration, is instantly cast into non-notability. The precedent for this is ] and ] where the subject was deleted because he was in the New York Times on the front page and that made him non-notable. It is time that the NYT come off the pages of wikipedia like the blackhole of notability it is. -- ] 22:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep'''. Very funny. ] | ] 22:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:03, 15 March 2006
The New York Times
Anti-notable. This AFD is being placed because the NYT is anti-notable, namely, that anyone mentioned in its pages, despite its preeminence, popularity, and market penetration, is instantly cast into non-notability. The precedent for this is Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/John Bambenek (2nd nomination) and Misplaced Pages:Deletion review#John Bambenek where the subject was deleted because he was in the New York Times on the front page and that made him non-notable. It is time that the NYT come off the pages of wikipedia like the blackhole of notability it is. -- Alpha269 22:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Very funny. Batmanand | Talk 22:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)