Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:47, 16 March 2006

1. Please stop removing content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shanel 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. ~ PseudoSudo 13:12, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

3. 

   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. RexNL 01:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Blocked.

You have been blocked. Please stop vandalizing.--Jondel 02:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Why would anyone with his right mind let this cultist, who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan and claims to be a Neuroscientist, muddle Misplaced Pages's credibility by inserting the following words in an article supposedly based on facts?

Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath, a Living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age, travels the world at the behest of Mahavatar Babaji.

So, does everyone here agree that the person who calls himself Gurunath is a Himalayan Siddha Master and that he travels the world at the behest of Mahavatar Babaji? Do those claims constitute fact? Why not reword them in a more realistic and socially acceptable way like: Another Indian teacher who calls himself Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath claims to be a living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age and travels the world to teach his own version of Kriya Yoga?

Why did I say that it should it be rendered like that?

1. No person of authority within the tradition in which this person who calls himself Gurunath claims to be a part and representative of has declared him as a Living Himalayan Siddha Master in the modern age.
2. Yogiraj Siddhanath Gurunath is just a fancy name he fabricated for himself, unless of course he or any of his cronies can prove that it is his proper and legal name registered in the Government of India and the one being used in his passport and other legal documents like land titles, etc. Aliases are alright but legal names should also be included; if the Pope's legal name is mentioned why not this person's? Hiding behind a fake name, which wasn'y even given to him according to tradition, prevents people from investigating about his background and probing the authenticity of his most pompous claims. It is tantamount to strenthening his cult and assisting him in his con work.
3. Who among us have hold any proof that he is travelling the world at Mahavatar Babaji's behest and not of his own behest to make money and con people?

Allowing the person who calls himself Hamsacharya Dan to promote his cult and god here in this way makes a tabloid out of Misplaced Pages, it further weakens its credibility.

Hi! Whoever you are, if you want to gain credibility, be more accountable like registering and not inserting statements like Can I suck your dick? --Jondel 04:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Yet another Babaji or too many Babajis!

Gotcha. I'll add another line to Babaji and remove the confusion from the Haidakhan Babaji page and blank the redirects if you will follow up by (re) creating the Hariakhan Baba page. Unfortunately, there appear to be quite a few webpages out there also confused on the issue, and I must have stumbled upon them... -Adityanath 00:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I've hopefully cleaned up the mess and fixed up all the articles. The Hariakhan Baba article can be filled out with more information from Mahendra Baba and Baba Hari Dasa that shouldn't clutter up the Mahavatar Babaji article. All three articles do or should mention the confusingly similarly named Haidakhan Babaji so no one tries to merge the articles. —Adityanath 01:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Removing comments

Do not remove comments from other peoples talk pages as it's vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Also read WP:NPA. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings

I see you have blanked recent warnings on this page. This is in direct violation of official Misplaced Pages policy; see Removing warnings under WP:VAND. Do not blank this page or you will be blocked again. If you have any reason to dispute this restoration, please leave a note at my talk page. Thanks, ~ PseudoSudo 08:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your blanking with edit summary "This is my own Talk Page, I can do whatever I want with it," this is unfortunately not the case. I'd suggest you read the section entitled Can I do whatever I want to my own user talk page? under Misplaced Pages:Talk pages to address this misconception of yours. This your last warning. Blank once more and you'll be blocked from editing; decision is up to you. ~ PseudoSudo 11:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Of course it is the case. I can do whatever I want with it. The article did not say that I can't. Even if you block me after I delete everything then still I was able to do what I want with it. Haven't you studied Logic? And why the hell can't I erase these warnings when they have already expired? I was already blocked, and so your "this is already your second warning" with the stop sign on the topmost of this page has already expired. The verdict was already served, and another sysop deemed it fit to immediately unblock me.

Now, what is your problem? Where does it state in any WP policy that I can be blocked because I deleted your comments in my own Talk Page? Your recent warnings are illegitimate. There is no ongoing issue that necessitates me to retain your bullshit and cocky comments in my own Talk Page.