| Revision as of 05:05, 12 July 2011 editSolar-Wind (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled94,838 edits category← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:51, 26 July 2011 edit undoMiradre (talk | contribs)9,214 edits added material from main singer pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Singer's argument is that the Left will be better able to achieve its social and economic goals if it incorporates the more accurate view of human nature provided by evolution: "To be blind to the facts about human nature is to risk disaster". For example, Singer argues that the Left's view of human nature as highly malleable, which he identifies with ] and the ], is incorrect. | Singer's argument is that the Left will be better able to achieve its social and economic goals if it incorporates the more accurate view of human nature provided by evolution: "To be blind to the facts about human nature is to risk disaster". For example, Singer argues that the Left's view of human nature as highly malleable, which he identifies with ] and the ], is incorrect. | ||
| Singer argues that ] suggests that humans naturally tend to be self-interested. He further argues that the evidence that selfish tendencies are natural must not be taken as evidence that selfishness is right. He concludes that ] (the mathematical study of strategy) and experiments in psychology offer hope that self-interested people will make short-term sacrifices for the good of others, if society provides the right conditions. Essentially Singer claims that although humans possess selfish, competitive tendencies naturally, they have a substantial capacity for ] that has also been selected for during ]. | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 26 July 2011
A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution and Cooperation is a book by Peter Singer (Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-08323-8), which argues that the view of human nature provided by evolution (e.g., evolutionary psychology) is compatible with and should be incorporated into the ideological framework of the Left.
Singer's argument is that the Left will be better able to achieve its social and economic goals if it incorporates the more accurate view of human nature provided by evolution: "To be blind to the facts about human nature is to risk disaster". For example, Singer argues that the Left's view of human nature as highly malleable, which he identifies with Marxism and the standard social science model, is incorrect.
Singer argues that evolutionary psychology suggests that humans naturally tend to be self-interested. He further argues that the evidence that selfish tendencies are natural must not be taken as evidence that selfishness is right. He concludes that game theory (the mathematical study of strategy) and experiments in psychology offer hope that self-interested people will make short-term sacrifices for the good of others, if society provides the right conditions. Essentially Singer claims that although humans possess selfish, competitive tendencies naturally, they have a substantial capacity for cooperation that has also been selected for during human evolution.
References
 | This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
External links
- A Darwinian Left for Today and Beyond Peter Singer Excerpted from A Darwinian Left, pp. 60-63.
- A Darwinian Left. By Leigh Van Valen. Scientific American.
- A Darwinian Left. Anonymous reviewer. The Complete Review.
 | This article about a political book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |