Revision as of 22:31, 26 July 2011 editJeffro77 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,570 editsm →Please, read it with heart← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:19, 27 July 2011 edit undoFakTNeviM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,319 edits sth.Next edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
--] (]) 14:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | --] (]) 14:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:'''You''' said at the Talk page that ''you'' would stop discussing the issue. If ''you'' choose to stop discussing something, that '''does not''' mean that I am not allowed to reply. And then ''you'' chose to continue discussion. If '''you''' don't want to discuss something, simply '''don't'''. Additionally, you made a personal attack immediately prior to saying you would 'stop' discussing. And then you retributively added false warnings to my User page, and made a false allegation of vandalism. And you claim that I misused Talk pages for 'Chat' when you have a subpage specifically for ].--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | :'''You''' said at the Talk page that ''you'' would stop discussing the issue. If ''you'' choose to stop discussing something, that '''does not''' mean that I am not allowed to reply. And then ''you'' chose to continue discussion. If '''you''' don't want to discuss something, simply '''don't'''. Additionally, you made a personal attack immediately prior to saying you would 'stop' discussing. And then you retributively added false warnings to my User page, and made a false allegation of vandalism. And you claim that I misused Talk pages for 'Chat' when you have a subpage specifically for ].--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I am just so much tired from Misplaced Pages and I don´t want to even ´read´ your response. I have my wikibreak. Respect it. | |||
::In my user space I can do what I wish and you have no right to reproach my personal chat in my user space with Lighthead. Huge difference among your public chat on main article´s talk page, what is in encyclopedic part and fully public. You should humble of your spying on me. You should humble for that. It was vile (not only uncivil) from you. | |||
I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need ] with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab´s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don´t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I´ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work. | I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need ] with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab´s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don´t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I´ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work. | ||
Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
--] (]) 18:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | --] (]) 18:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | :It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.--] (]) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I am glad you finally ´start trying to interpret´ my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally ´try to´ (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! --] (]) 10:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:19, 27 July 2011
Status: Unknown
Hello, welcome to my talk page!If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
|
TeamWork barnstar
This barnstar is given to You as my grateful appreciation for your tireless contributing in former times and by adding special flavor to WP:JW community, particularly with civility, racional arguments, useful style of cooperation and doing minor, but many specific acts toward better future and higher quality of articles in English Misplaced Pages. Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Please, read it with heart
(Template:uw-npa3) (Template:Uw-advert2) (Template:uw-socialnetwork) (Template:uw-delete4)
These are my personal! messages for you. Please respect others. I finished that !chat! . I leaved from my house. And after less than 20 minutes you despite that, continued talking. And start on me. I was forced to defend myself and you, you not waited for anything, just stronger pressure and still! talking. My only fault was I defend myself. Why did you still attacking on me? Do you have to win every time? Is there any personal problem? Why did you just can´t listen to me and stop with talk, when I stop talk. See that ref. I finished talk first, but you still continued. I wanted to cancel discussion before it could be dangerous and uncivil. But, this was preciously, what you wanted a searched for. Again. You won. Are you glad?
--Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 14:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- You said at the Talk page that you would stop discussing the issue. If you choose to stop discussing something, that does not mean that I am not allowed to reply. And then you chose to continue discussion. If you don't want to discuss something, simply don't. Additionally, you made a personal attack immediately prior to saying you would 'stop' discussing. And then you retributively added false warnings to my User page, and made a false allegation of vandalism. And you claim that I misused Talk pages for 'Chat' when you have a subpage specifically for chatting with another JW editor.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am just so much tired from Misplaced Pages and I don´t want to even ´read´ your response. I have my wikibreak. Respect it.
- In my user space I can do what I wish and you have no right to reproach my personal chat in my user space with Lighthead. Huge difference among your public chat on main article´s talk page, what is in encyclopedic part and fully public. You should humble of your spying on me. You should humble for that. It was vile (not only uncivil) from you.
I thought about our relation many times ago. I found there is something mutually disagreeable between us. Our problems are not about big differences in a worldview, but inside, in personality. Our sort of personality are absolutely incompatible. Every time we have factual talk about topic at the beginning, but finishing in a quarrel. We need a mediator with every issue solving next time. I found BlackCab´s replies on me always more factual, informative, more expected type of information in response, better attitude of cooperation even with those who don´t agree with him, which sometimes includes both of us. But, between you and me, this is not working at all. We always finishing in a quarrel. Next time, when I need to ask someone from WP:JW project to any issue, I´ll rather contact him or other man, because contact between us just does not work.
--Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 18:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is often difficult to interpret your broken English, and that may be a large part of the problem. However, in this instance, you were simply wrong.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am glad you finally ´start trying to interpret´ my thoughts. Previously you was disrespect, mocking, haughty, lofty Englishman. Now, you finally ´try to´ (and not still lazy as previous) at least. Wow! --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 10:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)