| Revision as of 06:48, 17 March 2006 editInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:31, 17 March 2006 edit undoKashk (talk | contribs)4,562 edits What do you have to say for yourself?Next edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| Thanks -- I need to calm down. ] 06:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | Thanks -- I need to calm down. ] 06:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == What do you have to say for yourself? == | |||
| You did not reply. You archieved the page AGAIN, for the third time to remove it. | |||
| What do you have to say for yourself for calling Cyrus the KABIR, the symbol of an ethnicity, an illiterate murder? | |||
| You should be ashamed. --] 10:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:31, 17 March 2006
This page is yours. Feel free to say whatever you want. Constructive feedbacks would be more than appreciated. --Aucaman 12:21, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
| Server time (UTC) 01:18 Wednesday 25-December-2024 |
 Archives |
|---|
Re:Persian peoples
I will see if I can help later, but I am watching it now. --a.n.o.n.y.m 01:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Re: your note on my page
Another admin beat me to giving that editor his final warning. If he bothers you again, I will block him. Having read the RfC filed in regards to your conduct, I can see that you're not entirely blameless here.... But that does not mean it is excusable for anyone else to violate policy and harass you. The issues you have chosen to edit are controversial ones, and there is nothing wrong with that. You (and everyone else) should be free to edit whatever they choose, without fear of harassment or even incivility from others. I would only recommend that you make sure to keep a cool head, and do not violate WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA (or, of course, any other policies) yourself, or you too will end up blocked. Right now, this case has gotten the attention of a small handful of administrators who are currently willing to defend you from the incivility of other editors. We will be disappointed if you do not respect the policies you wish us to uphold in judging the conduct of others. This is not a warning or an accusation, so please do not take it as such. If anything, it is a hope that cool heads and good, collaborative editing will prevail. Please let me know if there are any further issues. JDoorjam Talk 04:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
I hate to meddle, but the problem is not that people are against him because he makes controversial edit; it is that unfortunately he writes subjects that do not belong in an encyclopedia, yet, more importantly, he refuses to work with others under any circumstances, and in some way games the system. I really apologize for this, but we just don`t know what else to do; he is being very disruptive, and it is frustrating. Zmmz 05:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- What to do? You and Aucaman could agree that all notable viewpoints deserve to represented in articles. That very often takes the pressure off. All sides give their best case and the reader decides. Insisting that some things are not to be mentioned because they are "controversial" or "anti-Iranian" or "do not belong" is censorship. Zora 05:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- WHy don't you try some things are not to be mentioned becuase you true untrue and misleading! 69.196.139.250 06:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Why are you trying to frame Me When I ask you civily to reform and Be productive?
I have pointeed out all your mistakes to you for your own good but you try and have me blocked. That is not right. You are the one who tried to mislead me and other. I only ask you to reform for the good of the community. Those are not personally attacks. Did I ever make racist comments like you did. It was not me who mae racist comments or got into fights. It was you with other users. It is not me that mass complaints are being formed against it is you Acuman. When I ask you to be be civil and behave you try and make it look like I am attacking you. That is not right that is the exact sort of behaviour you are using in the articles that is bothering people. How could you try and say the Nazis are the ones who gave Iran its name when it has been called Iran for thousands of years! Iran was only called Persia in cetain foreign countries, not by Iranians, Central Asians, Far Easterners, the Arab World, Turkey, etc. But yet you continue and say that it is in the name of objectiveness. What you are doing is very not right. ANd by trying to make it look like I am attacking you it is even worst. Instead of racist comments go make peace with the people you attacked.69.196.139.250 06:19, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
69.196.139.250 (talk · contribs)
AFAICT, he's not supposed to be. His last block has since expired. --InShaneee 06:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- As it says there, that was for 48 hours. He's now been blocked for another 48, though I think that copy/paste was some sort of accident (which I'll remove). --InShaneee 06:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Good point!
Thanks -- I need to calm down. Zora 06:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
What do you have to say for yourself?
You did not reply. You archieved the page AGAIN, for the third time to remove it.
What do you have to say for yourself for calling Cyrus the KABIR, the symbol of an ethnicity, an illiterate murder?
You should be ashamed. --Kash 10:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)